Re: DTDs for VRML

Jeff Sonstein (jeffs@tlg.net)
Tue, 15 Dec 1998 20:49:45 -0800

> Not "everyone" is saying the XML approach should look
> like VRML97. I know people have been talking about
> alternitives.

thank you

> -----Original Message-----
> I think we should think more about objects and
> interfaces than shapes and geometries.
>
> For example:

Clay's example makes a lot of sense
(and king of example-elegance is he)

<SOAPBOX>
I for one am not really interested in
making VRML into XML
and I *am* interested in
the potential for being able to more easily express
objects generic thingies into/from VRML

XML as part of the path to glueing together the Web
makes a lot of sense to me
and making VRML *into* XML
doesn't
</SOAPBOX>

jeffs at the vrmLab

--
Jeff Sonstein, MA   http://ariadne.iz.net/
    http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc
==========================================
there are no bugs
there are just undocumented features

------------------------------------------------------------------------ for list subscription instructions, send email to dbwork-request@vrml.org with text "info"