[This local archive copy mirrored from the canonical site: http://www.ucc.ie/xml/, June 02, 1998; links may not have complete integrity, so use the canonical document at this URL if possible.]
Maintained on behalf of the World Wide Web Consortium's XML Special Interest Group by Peter Flynn, (University College Cork), with the collaboration of Terry Allen, (), Tom Borgman, (Harlequin Ltd), Tim Bray, (Textuality, Inc), Robin Cover, (Summer Institute of Linguistics), Christopher Maden, (O'Reilly & Associates), Eve Maler, (Arbortext, Inc), Peter Murray-Rust, (Nottingham University), Liam Quin, (), Michael Sperberg-McQueen, (University of Illinois at Chicago), Joel Weber, (MIT), Murata, Makoto (Fuji Xerox Information Systems), and many other members of the XML Special Interest Group of the W3C as well as FAQ readers around the world. Please use the form at the end for any corrections or additions.
1 June 1998
- Removed the math plugin (Linux Netscape is broken and refused to elide it)
- Updated list of events (need more)
- Fixed some broken URLs
- Added Spanish and Korean translations and the Annotated Spec
- Updated details of MS/NS browser development
- Clarified the use of FPI vs SysiD
- Updated link to Feb 10 Rec Spec
- Added pointers to the SGML Decl for XML
- Updated references to XLink and XPointer
- Corrected a reference to ancient Sumerian writing
- Clarified the need for conversion of HTML DTDs to XML
- Typos and minor corrections
Paragraphs which have been added since the last version are shown prefixed with a pilcrow (¶). Paragraphs which have been changed since the last version are shown prefixed with a section sign (§). Paragraphs marked for future deletion but retained at the moment for information are prefixed with a plus/minus sign (±).
This document contains the most frequently-asked questions (with answers) about XML, the Extensible Markup Language. It is intended as a first resource for users, developers, and the interested reader, and should not be regarded as a part of the XML Specification.
The FAQ is divided into four parts: a) General, b) User, c) Author, and d) Developer. The questions are numbered independently within each section. As the numbering may therefore change with each version, comments and suggestions should refer to the version number (see Revision History above) as well as the Part and Question Number.
There is a form at the end of this document which you can use to submit bug reports, suggestions for improvement, and other comments relating to this FAQ only. Comments about the XML Specification itself should be sent to the W3C.
The SGML file for use with any conforming SGML system is available at http://www.ucc.ie/xml/faq.sgml (this can also be used online with SGML browsers like Panorama or Multidoc Pro; you can also download the DTD and stylesheet installation self-extractor for faster local access with these browsers, or the DTD set as ASCII files).
The same text is available in an HTML version for use with an HTML browser (eg Netscape Navigator, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Spry Mosaic, NCSA Mosaic, Lynx, Opera, GNUscape Navigator etc) at http://www.ucc.ie/xml/.
An XML version will be produced once the specification has been agreed and when DTDs and browsers are available to handle it.
A plaintext (ASCII) version is available from the Web and (eventually) by anonymous FTP to one of several FAQ repositories. The versions above are also available by electronic mail to the WebMail server (for users with email-only access).
For printed copies there are PostScriptTM versions for A4 and Letter sizes of paper.
The document is also available in oil-based toner on flattened dead trees by sending $10 (or equivalent) to the editor (email first to check currency and postal address).
§ Thanks to Murata Makoto for making this document available in Japanese: see http://www.fxis.co.jp/DMS/sgml/xml/xmlfaq.html; to Jaime Sagarduy of the Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao for the translation into Spanish (see http://www.ucc.ie/xml/faq-es.html); to Techno 2000 Project for the Korean version at http://xml.t2000.co.kr/faq/index.html; and to Tim Bray for the Annotated Spec at http://www.xml.com/axml/testaxml.htm
You can download the XML logo and an icon for your files in ICO (Microsoft Windows), Mac, or XBM (X Window system) format.
It‘s actually slightly misnamed: XML itself is not a single markup language: it‘s a metalanguage to let you design your own markup language. A regular markup language defines a way to describe information in a certain class of documents (eg HTML). XML lets you define your own customized markup languages for many classes of document. It can do this because it‘s written in SGML, the international standard metalanguage for markup languages.
XML is designed `to make it easy and straightforward to use SGML on the Web: easy to define document types, easy to author and manage SGML-defined documents, and easy to transmit and share them across the Web.'
It defines `an extremely simple dialect of SGML which is completely described in the XML Specification. The goal is to enable generic SGML to be served, received, and processed on the Web in the way that is now possible with HTML.'
`For this reason, XML has been designed for ease of implementation, and for interoperability with both SGML and HTML' [quotes from the XML spec].
SGML is the Standard Generalized Markup Language (ISO 8879), the international standard for defining descriptions of the structure and content of different types of electronic document. There is an SGML FAQ at http://www.infosys.utas.edu.au/info/sgmlfaq.txt and the SGML Web pages are at http://www.sil.org/sgml/.
§ Not quite. SGML is the `mother tongue', used for describing thousands of different document types in many fields of human activity, from transcriptions of ancient Sumerian tablets to the technical documentation for stealth bombers, and from patients‘ clinical records to musical notation.
HTML is just one of these document types, the one most frequently used in the Web. It defines a single, fixed type of document with markup that lets you describe a common class of simple office-style report, with headings, paragraphs, lists, illustrations, etc, and some provision for hypertext and multimedia.
XML is an abbreviated version of SGML, to make it easier for you to define your own document types, and to make it easier for programmers to write programs to handle them. It omits the more complex and less-used parts of SGML in return for the benefits of being easier to write applications, easier to understand, and more suited to delivery and interoperability over the Web. But it is still SGML, and XML files may still be parsed and validated the same as any other SGML file (see the question on XML software).
Programmers may find it useful to think of XML as being SGML-- rather than HTML++.
XML is a project of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), and the development of the specification is being supervised by their XML Working Group. A Special Interest Group of co-opted contributors and experts from various fields contributes comments and reviews by email.
§ XML is a public format: it is not a proprietary development of any company. The v1.0 specification was accepted by the W3C as Recommendation on Feb 10, 1998.
It removes two constraints which are holding back Web developments:
dependence on a single, inflexible document type (HTML);
the complexity of full SGML, whose syntax allows many powerful but hard-to-program options.
XML simplifies the levels of optionality in SGML, and allows the development of user-defined document types on the Web.
To make SGML simpler, XML redefines some of SGML‘s internal values and parameters, and removes a large number of the more complex and sometimes less-used features which made it harder to write processing programs (see Appendix A of the XML specification).
But it retains all of SGML‘s structural abilities which let you define your own document type. It also introduces a new class of document which does not require you to use a predefined document type. See the questions about `valid' and `well-formed' documents, and how to define your own document types in the Developers‘ Section.
HTML is already overburdened with dozens of interesting but often incompatible inventions from different manufacturers, because it provides only one way of describing your information.
XML will allow groups of people or organizations to create their own customized markup languages for exchanging information in their domain (music, chemistry, electronics, hill-walking, finance, surfing, linguistics, mathematics, knitting, history, engineering, rabbit-keeping, mathematics, etc).
HTML is at the limit of its usefulness as a way of describing information, and while it will continue to play an important role for the content it currently represents, many new applications require a more robust and flexible infrastructure.
Information on a network which connects many different types of computer has to be usable on all of them. Public information cannot afford to be restricted to one make or model or manufacturer, or to cede control of its data format to private hands. It is also helpful for such information to be in a form that can be reused in many different ways, as this can minimize wasted time and effort.
SGML is the international standard which is used for defining this kind of application, but those who need an alternative based on different software are entirely free to implement similar services using such a system, especially if they are for private use.
Online, there‘s the XML Specification and ancillary documentation available from the W3C; an XML section with an extensive list of online reference material in Robin Cover‘s SGML pages; and a summary and condensed FAQ from Tim Bray.
§ The items listed below are the ones I have been told about: please mail me if you come across others.
§ The annual SGML Conference run by the Graphic Communications Association was renamed the SGML/XML Conference in 1997. SGML/XML '98 is being held in Chicago on November 16-19 (further details on the GCA's Web site).
There is a list of books and articles on XML in Robin Cover‘s SGML pages.
There is a mailing list called xml-dev for those committed to developing components for XML. You can subscribe by sending a 1-line mail message to firstname.lastname@example.org saying:
subscribe xml-dev yourname@yoursite
The list is hypermailed for online reference at http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/.
Note that this list is for those people actively involved in developing resources for XML. It is not for general information about XML (see this FAQ and other sources) or for general discussion about SGML implementation and resources (see comp.text.sgml).
There is a general-purpose mailing list XML-L for public discussions: to subscribe, send a 1-line mail message to LISTSERV@listserv.hea.ie saying
subscribe XML-L forename surname
(substituting your own forename and surname). To unsubscribe, send a 1-line message to the same address saying
Please Read The Fine Documentation which you will be sent when you join either mailing list, as it contains important information, particularly about what to do when your email address changes.
Not yet. XML is still being developed, but there are already some pilot browsers, so you can experiment with them. When the specification is complete, more software should start to appear, and you may be able to download browsers and use them to browse the Web much as you do with current applications.
You can use the pilot browsers to look at some of the emerging XML material, such as Jon Bosak‘s Shakespeare plays and the molecular experiments of the Chemical Markup Language (CML). There are some more example sources listed at http://www.sil.org/sgml/xml.html#examples.
If you want to start preparations for writing your own XML, see the questions in the Authors‘ Section.
Authors and providers can design their own document types using XML, instead of being stuck with HTML. Document types can be explicitly tailored to an audience, so the cumbersome fudging that has to take place with HTML to achieve special effects should become a thing of the past: authors and designers will be free to invent their own markup elements;
Information content can be richer and easier to use, because the hypertext linking abilities of XML are much greater than those of HTML.
XML can provide more and better facilities for browser presentation and performance;
It removes many of the underlying complexities of SGML in favor of a more flexible model, so writing programs to handle XML will be much easier than doing the same for full SGML.
Information will be more accessible and reusable, because the more flexible markup of XML can be used by any XML software instead of being restricted to specific manufacturers as has become the case with HTML.
Valid XML files are kosher SGML, so they can be used outside the Web as well, in an SGML environment (once the spec is stable and SGML software adopts it).
There are already some browsers emerging, but the XML specification is still new. As with HTML, there won‘t be just one browser, but many. However, because the potential number of different XML applications is not limited, no single browser should be expected to handle 100% of everything.
The generic parts of XML (eg parsing, tree management, searching, formatting, etc) are being combined into general-purpose browser libraries or toolkits to make it easier for developers to take a consistent line when writing XML applications. Such applications could then be customized by adding semantics for specific markets, or using languages like Java to develop plugins for generic browsers and have the specialist modules delivered transparently over the Web.
§ Netscape and Microsoft are both now developing XML facilities: some development work at Microsoft can be seen at http://www.microsoft.com/msdn/sdk/inetsdk/help/ (MSIE4 contains two XML parsers but they currently render to HTML for display).
¶ Netscape have released their source code for public cooperative development (see http://www.mozilla.org/) and are including an application of RDF plus James Clark's expat XML parser in the 2.0 release of Mozilla.
Authors should also read the Developers‘ Section, which contains further information about the internals of XML files.
No, XML itself does not replace HTML: instead, it provides an alternative by allowing you to define your own set of markup elements. HTML is expected to remain in common use for some time to come, and DTDs will be available in XML versions as well as the original SGML versions. XML is designed to make the writing of DTDs much simpler than with full SGML.
Work is going on to produce XML versions of HTML and other popular DTDs, but this may not take off until the specification for XML 1.0 is complete (targeted November 1997). Watch comp.text.sgml and XML-L for announcements.
The basic structure is very similar to most other applications of SGML, including HTML. XML documents can be very simple, with no document type declaration, and straightforward nested markup of your own design:
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <conversation> <greeting>Hello, world!</greeting> <response>Stop the planet, I want to get off!</response> </conversation>
Or they can be more complicated, with a DTD specified, and maybe an internal subset, and a more complex structure:
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="no" encoding="UTF-8"?> <!DOCTYPE titlepage SYSTEM "http://www.frisket.org/dtds/typo.dtd" [<!ENTITY % active.links "INCLUDE">]> <titlepage> <white-space type="vertical" amount="36"/> <title font="Baskerville" size="24/30" alignment="centered">Hello, world!</title> <white-space type="vertical" amount="12"/> <!-- In some copies the following decoration is hand-colored, presumably by the author --> <image location="http://www.foo.bar/fleuron.eps" type="URL" alignment="centered"/> <white-space type="vertical" amount="24"/> <author font="Baskerville" size="18/22" style="italic">Munde Salutem</author> </titlepage>
Or they can be anywhere between: a lot will depend on how you want to define your document type (or whose you use) and what it will be used for. See the question on valid and well-formed files.
The SGML rules regarding white-space have been changed for XML, so all white-space, including linebreaks, TAB characters, and regular spaces, is passed by the parser unchanged to the application (browser, formatter, viewer, etc). This means:
`insignificant' white-space between structural elements (those which can contain only other elements, not text data, sometimes called `element content') will get passed to the application (under `full' SGML this white-space is suppressed);
`significant' white-space within elements which can contain text and markup mixed together (`mixed content' or PCDATA [parsed character data]) will still get passed to the application as before.
<chapter> <section> <title> My title for Section 1. </title> <para> ... </para> </section> </chapter>
The parser must, however, still inform the application what white-space occurred in element content, if known. (Users of `full' SGML may recognize that this information was not in the ESIS, but it is in the grove.) In the above example, the application will receive all the pretty-printing linebreaks, TABs, and spaces between the elements as well as those embedded in the section title. It is the function of the application (browser, formatter, viewer, etc) to decide which type of white-space to discard and which to retain.
All of an XML file is case-sensitive, both markup and text. This is significantly different from HTML and many other SGML document types. It was introduced to allow markup in non-Latin-alphabet scripts and to obviate problems with case-folding in scripts which are caseless.
Element names (used in start-tags and end-tags) are case-sensitive: you must stick with whatever combination of upper- or lower-case you use to define them (either by usage or in a DTD);
For well-formed files with no DTD, the first
occurrence of an element name defines the casing. So you can‘t
<BODY> . . .
</body>: upper- and lower-case must match; thus
two different elements;
Attribute names are also case-sensitive, on a
per-element basis: for example
in the same file exhibit two separate attributes,
because the different casings of
WIDTH distinguish them;
Attribute values are also case-sensitive. Character
data values (eg
HRef="MyFile.SGML") are exactly as
before, but ID and IDREF attributes are case-sensitive and no longer get
folded to uppercase for comparisons;
All entity names (
and your data content (your text), are case-sensitive, exactly as
Make them well-formed (see below). A DTD is optional in XML, but HTML files currently have to be DTDless anyway, because there is no XML version of the HTML DTD yet (on its way). It is necessary to convert existing HTML files to be well-formed because XML does not allow end-tag minimization as allowed in most HTML DTDs. Many HTML authoring tools already produce almost (but not quite) well-formed XML.
§ All XML documents must be well-formed (see below), but a DTD is optional. HTML files can be converted to a DTD-less form of XML, but there cannot be XML versions of the current SGML-based HTML DTDs: they need to be substantially edited to remove their dependence on those features of SGML which are excluded from XML. However, many HTML authoring tools already produce almost (but not quite) well-formed DTD-less XML. There is a pilot site (http://www.xmlx.com/) for the exchange of XML DTDs.
DOCTYPE declaration and any internal subset
(basically everything within the first set of angled brackets
HTML...>) with the XML Declaration <?xml
EMPTY elements (eg
in the header, and
<OF> in the body) so that they end
with `/>', for example
ensure there are correctly-matched explicit end-tags
for all non-empty elements; eg every
<P> must have a
this can be automated by a normalizer program like sgmlnorm
(part of SP)
or a function in an editor like Emacs/psgml‘s
escape all markup characters (<
and &) as
ensure all attribute values are in quotes;
ensure all occurrences of all element names in start-tags and end-tags match with respect to upper- and lower-case and that they are consistent throughout the file;
ensure all attribute names are similarly in a consistent case throughout the file.
Be aware that many HTML browsers may not accept XML-style
EMPTY elements with the trailing slash, so the above
changes are not backwards-compatible. An alternative is to add a dummy
end-tag to all
EMPTY elements, so
If you have a lot of valid HTML files, you could write a script in an SGML conversion system to do this (such as Omnimark, Balise, SGMLC, or a system using one of the SGML Perl libraries), or you could even use edit macros if you know what you‘re doing.
If your HTML files are invalid then they will almost certainly have to be converted manually, although if the deformities are regular and carefully constructed, the files may actually be almost well-formed, and you could write a program or script to do as described above. To test for invalidity and non-conformance, check the following:
do the files contain markup syntax
errors? For example, are there any backslashes instead of forward
slashes on end-tags; or elements which nest incorrectly (eg
<SAMP>an element which starts <EM>inside one
element</SAMP> but ends outside it</EM>)?
do the files contain markup which conflicts with the HTML DTDs, such as headings inside list items, or list items outside list environments?
do the files use elements which are not in any DTD? Although this is easy to transform to a DTDless well-formed file (because you don‘t have to define elements in advance) most proprietary [browser-specific] extensions have never been formally defined, so it is often impossible to work out where they can meaningfully be used.
Markup which is valid but which is meaningless or void may need to be edited out before conversion (such as repeated empty paragraphs or linebreaks, empty tables, invisible `spacing' GIFs etc: XML uses stylesheets, so you won‘t need any of these)
See the rules for `well-formed' XML files for details of what you need to check in XML when converting.
Note there are XML versions of the HTML DTD in preparation:
§ Ben Trafford is developing an XML version of HTML 3.2
[details of others sought: please contact the editor]
Yes, provided: a) the document has a valid Document
Type Definition (DTD), ie the
files are valid, not just
well-formed; and b) you use software which knows about the features needed
to support XML, such as the special form for
elements; some aspects of the SGML Declaration such as
GENERAL NO; multiple attribute declarations.
At the moment there are few tools which handle XML files
unchanged because of the format of these
elements, but this is changing. The nsgmls
parser has an experimental XML conformance switch, and the first
XML-specific editors and parsers are appearing (see the question on
The rules of ISO 8879 are up for minor amendments, some of which are to facilitate changes needed for Web-enablement.
Yes, very easily, but at the moment there is still a need for tutorials, simple tools, and more examples of XML documents. Well-formed XML documents may look similar to HTML except for some small but very important points of syntax.
As every user community can have their own document type defined, it should be much easier to learn, because element names can be picked for relevance.
Yes, the XML Specification explicitly says XML uses ISO 10646, the international standard 31-bit character repertoire which covers most human (and some non-human) written languages. This is currently congruent with Unicode.
The spec says (2.2): `All XML processors must accept the UTF-8 and UTF-16 encodings of ISO 10646 . . . '. UTF-8 is an encoding of Unicode into 8-bit characters: the first 128 are the same as ASCII, the rest are used to encode the rest of Unicode into sequences of between 2 and 6 bytes. UTF-8 in its single-octet form is therefore the same as ISO 646 IRV (ASCII), so you can continue to use ASCII for English or other unaccented languages using the Latin alphabet. Note that UTF-8 is incompatible with ISO 8859-1 (ISO Latin-1) after code point 126 decimal (the end of ASCII). UTF-16 is like UTF-8 but with a scheme to represent the next 16 planes of 64k characters as two 16-bit characters.
` . . . the mechanisms for signalling which of the two are in use, and for bringing other encodings into play, are [ . . . ] in the discussion of character encodings.' The XML Specification explains how to specify in your XML file which coded character set you are using.
Use of UCS-4 can only legally be specified in SGML or XML when the pending `WebSGML Adaptations' to ISO 8879 come into force to enable numbers longer than eight digits to be used in the SGML Declaration.
`Regardless of the specific encoding used, any character
in the ISO 10646 character set may be referred to by the decimal or
hexadecimal equivalent of its bit string': so no matter which
character set you personally use, you can still refer to specific
individual characters from elsewhere in the encoded repertoire by using
(decimal character code) or
(hexadecimal character code, in uppercase).
The terminology can get confusing, as can the numbers: see the ISO 10646 Concept Dictionary.
A DTD is usually a file (or several files to be used together)
which contains a formal definition of a particular type of document.
This sets out what names can be used for elements, where they may occur,
and how they all fit together. For example, if you want a document type
<LIST>s which contain
<ITEM>s, part of your DTD would
contain something like
<!ELEMENT item (#pcdata)> <!ELEMENT list (item)+>
This defines items containing text, and lists containing items. It‘s a formal language which lets processors automatically parse a document and identify where every element comes and how they relate to each other, so that stylesheets, navigators, browsers, search engines, databases, printing routines, and other applications can be used.
[Note that in XML, there are no minimization parameters (`-' and `O' characters in element definitions between element name and content model), because all elements except empty ones must have both start-tag and end-tag present at all times.]
There are thousands of SGML DTDs already in existence in all kinds of areas (see the SGML Web pages for examples). Many of them can be downloaded and used freely; or you can write your own. As with any language, you need to learn it to do this: but XML is much simpler than full SGML: see the list of restrictions which shows what has been cut out. Existing SGML DTDs need to be converted to XML for use with XML systems: expect to see announcements soon of popular DTDs becoming available in XML format.
The linking abilities of XML systems
are much more powerful than those of HTML, so you‘ll be able to do
much more with them. Existing
HREF-style links will remain usable, but new linking
technology is based on the lessons learned in the development of other
standards involving hypertext, such as
HyTime, which let you
manage bidirectional and multi-way links, as well as links to a span of
text (within your own or other documents) rather than to a single point.
This is already implemented for SGML in browsers like
Panorama and Multidoc Pro.
§ The XML Linking Specification (XLink) and XML Extended Pointer Specification (XPointer) documents contain a detailed specification. An XML link can be either a URL or a TEI-style Extended Pointer (`XPointer'), or both. A URL on its own is assumed to be a resource (as with HTML); if an XPointer follows it, it is assumed to be a sub-resource of that URL; an Xptr on its own is assumed to apply to the current document.
An XPointer is always preceded by one of #, ?, or |. The # and ? mean the same as in HTML applications; the | means the sub-resource can be found by applying the XPointer to the resource, but the method of doing this is left to the application.
§ The TEI Extended Pointer Notation (EPN) is much more powerful than the `fragment address' on the end of some URLs. For example, the word `XPointer' two paragraphs back could be referred to as http://www.ucc.ie/xml/faq.sgml#ID(faq-hypertext)CHILD(2,*)(6,*), meaning the sixth child object within the second child object after the element whose ID is faq-hypertext. Count the objects from the start of this question in the SGML version (which has the ID `faq-hypertext'):
the title of the question;
<SECT2 ID="faq-hypertext"> <TITLE>How will XML affect my document links?</TITLE>
the second paragraph:
the character data from the start of the paragraph to the first item of markup:
the markup item:
<ULINK URL="http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xlink">XML Linking Specification (XLink)</ULINK>
the text item:
the markup item:
<ULINK URL="http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/WD-xptr">XML Extended Pointer Specification (XPointer)</ULINK>
the next stretch of character data:
documents contain a detailed specification. An XML link can be either a URL or a TEI-style Extended Pointer (
and the next markup item:
If you view this file with Panorama or MultiDoc Pro you can click on the highlighted cross-reference button at the start of the example sentence, and it will display the locations in Extended Pointer Notation of all the links to it, including the word `Xptr' mentioned. (Doing this in an HTML browser is not meaningful, as they do not support bidirectional linking or EPN.)
Yes, if the document type you use provides for math. The mathematics-using community is developing software, and there is a MathML proposal at the W3C, which is a native XML application. It would also be possible to make XML fragments from the long-expired HTML3, HTML Pro, or ISO 12083 Math, or OpenMath, or one of your own making. Browsers which display simple math embedded in SGML already exist (eg Panorama, Multidoc Pro).
§ The sophistication could vary from math expressions like through simple inline equations such as to display equations like
(If you are using an HTML browser to read this, of course, the above equations may not be rendered correctly.) The Amaya testbed browser at the W3C has an experimental MathML display.
Because XML lets you define your own markup language, you can make full use of the extended hypertext features (see the question on Links) of XML to store or link to metadata in any format (eg Dublin Core, Warwick Framework, Resource Description Framework (RDF), and Platform for Internet Content Selection (PICS)).
There are no predefined elements in XML, because it is an architecture, not an application, so it is not part of XML‘s job to specify how or if authors should or should not implement metadata. You are therefore free to use any suitable method from simple attributes to the embedding of entire Dublin Core/Warwick Framework metadata records. Browser makers may also have their own architectural recommendations or methods to propose.
This depends on what facilities the browser makers implement. XML is about describing information; scripting languages and languages for embedded functionality are the software which enables the information to be manipulated at the user‘s end.
XML itself provides a way to define the markup needed to implement scripting languages: as a neutral standard it neither encourages not discourages their use, and does not favour one language over another, so the field is wide open. Developments are ongoing: see John Tigue‘s suggestions for standardising the API for Java in respect of XML.
The use of a stylesheet is implicit in XML. Some browsers may
possibly provide simple default styles for popular elements like
<ITEM>, but in general a
stylesheet gives the author much better control of the layout. But as
with any system where files can be viewed at random by arbitrary users,
the author cannot know what resources (such as fonts) are on the user‘s
system, so care is needed.
The international standard for stylesheets for SGML documents is DSSSL, the Document Style and Semantics Specification Language (ISO 10179). This provides Scheme-like languages for stylesheets and document conversion, and is extensively implemented in the Jade formatter.
The Cascading Stylesheet Specification (CSS) provides a simple syntax for assigning styles to elements, and has been implemented in HTML browsers.
The Synex stylesheet DTD as already used in Panorama and MultiDoc Pro;
A new Extensible Style Language (XSL) is being proposed for use specifically with XML. This uses XML syntax (a stylesheet is actually an XML file) and combines formatting features from both DSSSL and CSS (HTML) and has already attracted support from several major vendors.
It remains to be seen which ones browsers will implement.
Graphics are just links, so they can be done in any way supported by the XLink and XPointer specifications (see earlier question), including using similar syntax to existing HTML images. These specifications, however, give you much better control over the traversal and activation of links, so you can choose, for example, whether or not to have an image appear when the page is loaded, or on a click from the user, or in a separate window, without having to resort to scripting.
Which graphic file formats will be supported is a matter for the browser makers: XML itself doesn't predict or restrict you. GIF, JPG, TIFF, and CGM at a minimum would seem to make sense.
Right here (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml). Includes the EBNF. There are also versions in Japanese (http://www.fxis.co.jp/DMS/sgml/xml/); Spanish (http://www.ucc.ie/xml/faq-es.html); Korean (http://xml.t2000.co.kr/faq/index.html) and a Java-ised annotated version at http://www.xml.com/axml/testaxml.htm.
Full SGML uses a Document Type Definition (DTD) to describe the markup (elements) available in any specific type of document. However, the design and construction of a DTD can be a complex and non-trivial task, so XML has been designed so it can be used either with or without a DTD. DTDless operation means you can invent markup without having to define it formally.
To make this work, a DTDless file in effect `defines' its own markup, informally, by the existence and location of elements where you create them. But when an XML application such as a browser encounters a DTDless file, it needs to be able to understand the document structure as it reads it, because it has no DTD to tell it what to expect, so some changes have been made to the rules.
For example, HTML‘s
element is defined as `
doesn‘t have an end-tag. Without a DTD, an XML application would
have no way to know whether or not to expect an end-tag for an element,
so the concept of `well-formed' has been
introduced. This makes the start and end of every element, and the
EMPTY elements completely unambiguous.
All XML documents must be well-formed:
if there is no DTD in use, the document must start with a Standalone Document Declaration (SDD) saying so:
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <foo> <bar>...<blort/>...</bar> </foo>
all tags must be balanced: that is, all elements which may contain character data must have both start- and end-tags present (omission is not allowed except for empty elements, see below);
all attribute values must be in quotes (the
single-quote character [the apostrophe] may be used if the value
contains a double-quote character, and vice versa):
if you need both, use
<BR> would become either
there must not be any isolated markup characters (
&) in your text data (ie
they must be given as
&), and the sequence
]]> must be given as ]]>
if it does not occur as the end of a
elements must nest inside each other properly (no overlapping markup, same rule as for all SGML);
Well-formed files with no DTD may use attributes on any element, but the attributes must all be of type CDATA by default.
Well-formed XML files with no DTD are considered to have
& predefined and thus available
for use even without a DTD. Valid XML files must declare them
explicitly if they use them.
§ A valid file begins like any other SGML file with a Document Type Declaration, but may have an optional XML Declaration prepended:
<?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE advert SYSTEM "http://www.foo.org/ad.dtd"> <advert> <headline>...<pic/>...</headline> <text>...</text> </advert>
The XML Specification defines an SGML Declaration for XML which is fixed for all instances (the declaration has been removed from the text of the Specification and is now in a separate document). An XML version of the specified DTD must be accessible to the XML processor, either by being available locally (ie the user already has a copy on disk), or by being retrievable via the network. You can specify this by supplying the URL for the DTD in a System Identifier (as in the example above). It is possible (some people would say preferable) to supply a Formal Public Identifier, but if used, this must precede the System Identifier, which must still be given (and only the PUBLIC keyword is used), eg:
<!DOCTYPE advert PUBLIC "-//Foo, Inc//DTD Advertisements//EN" "http://www.foo.org/ad.dtd">
<!DOCTYPE advert SYSTEM "http://www.foo.org/ad.dtd">
The defaults for the other attributes of the XML Declaration are
The principal changes are in what you can do in writing a Document Type Definition (DTD). To simplify the syntax and make it easier to write processing software, a large number of markup declaration options have been suppressed (see Appendix A of the XML Specification).
An extra delimiter is permitted in Names (the colon) for use in experiments with namespaces (enabling DTDs to distinguish element source, ownership, or application). A colon may only appear in mid-name, though, not at the start or the end, and the syntax may change in a future version.
Details have been removed as they are now changing too rapidly to be duplicated in this FAQ: see the XML pages at http://www.sil.org/sgml/xml.html.
Only to serve up .xml files as the correct MIME type (text/xml), so for serving XML documents all that is needed is to edit the mime-types file (or its equivalent) and add the line
text/xml xml XML
In some servers (eg Apache), users can change the MIME type for specific file types from their own directories by using a .htaccess file.
§ Since XML is designed to support stylesheets and sophisticated hyperlinking, XML documents will be accompanied by ancillary files in the same way that SGML files are: DTDs, entity files, catalogs, stylesheets, etc, which may need their own MIME Content-Type entry, and which require placing in the appropriate directories. XUA (XML User Agent), which is one of the planned deliverables of the XML WG, might provide a mechanism for packaging XML documents and XSL styles into a single message.
If you run scripts generating HTML, which you wish to work with XML, they will need to be modified to produce the relevant document type.
The same rule applies as for
so you need to ensure that any embedded code which gets passed to a
third-party engine (eg SDQL
writes, LiveWire requests,
etc) does not contain any characters
which might be misinterpreted as XML markup (ie
no angle brackets or ampersands): either use a
marked section to avoid your XML application parsing the embedded code,
or use the standard
& character entity references
For implementation to succeed, the terminology needs to be precise.
Example: `element' and
`tag' are not synonymous: an element is a whole
unit of information with its markup, and may consist of a start-tag
alone (as in HTML‘s
<BR>) or a start-tag and an end-tag
and the content which goes between them; tags
alone are simply the markers at the start and end of elements.
Sloppy terminology in specifications causes misunderstandings, so formal standards have to be phrased in formal terminology. This is not a formal document, and the astute reader may already have noticed it refers to `element names' where `element type names' is more correct; but the former is more widely understood.
Several are reported to be under development. The ones I have found so far are:
[anyone with details of others please let me know]
The big SGML conversion and application development engines like Balise, Omnimark, and SGMLC are all working on XML versions. Details of SGML software of all kinds are on the SGML Web pages.