From: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-10.txt
Title: The Atom "deleted-entry" Element
Reference: IETF Network Working Group, Internet Draft 'draft-snell-atompub-tombstones'
Date: June 22, 2010
Data Tracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones/
History: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones/#history
Tracker Listing: http://ietfreport.isoc.org/idref/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones/
Tools: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-10 (HTML)
Diff with version -09: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-10.txt
Announced: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/i-d-announce/current/msg31562.html
See also: Mailing List Archive for atom-syntax
http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/
Mailing List Archive for atom-protocol
http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/
http://xml.coverpages.org/atom.html
Atom Publishing Format and Protocol
http://xml.coverpages.org/AtomSpecs.html
Atom Specifications
==============================================================================
Network Working Group J. Snell
Internet-Draft June 22, 2010
Updates: 4287 (if approved)
Intended status: Informational
Expires: December 24, 2010
The Atom "deleted-entry" Element
draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-10.txt
Abstract
This specification adds mechanisms to the Atom Syndication Format
which publishers of Atom Feed and Entry documents can use to
explicitly identify Atom entries that have been removed.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 24, 2010.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Atom deleted-entry June 2010
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Notational Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. The at:deleted-entry element . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Deleted Entry Document . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Digital Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Encryption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
10. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Atom deleted-entry June 2010
1. Introduction
This specification adds mechanisms to the Atom Syndication Format
which publishers of Atom Feed and Entry documents can use to
explicitly identify Atom entries that have been removed.
2. Notational Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, [RFC2119]
This specification uses XML Namespaces [W3C.REC-xml-names-19990114]
to uniquely identify XML element names. It uses the following
namespace prefix for the indicated namespace URI;
"at": "http://purl.org/atompub/tombstones/1.0"
3. The at:deleted-entry element
The at:deleted-entry element represents an Atom Entry that has been
removed.
deletedEntry = element at:deleted-entry {
atomCommonAttributes,
attribute ref { atomUri },
attribute when { atomDateConstruct },
( element at:by { atomPersonConstruct}?,
& element at:comment {atomTextConstruct}?,
& element atom:link*,
& element atom:source?,
& extensionElement* )
}
The at:deleted-entry element MUST contain a ref attribute whose value
specifies the value of the atom:id of the entry that has been
removed.
The at:deleted-entry element MUST contain a when attribute whose
value is an [RFC3339] "date-time" specifying the instant the entry
was removed. An uppercase "T" character MUST be used to separate
date and time, and an uppercase "Z" character MUST be present in the
absence of a numeric time zone offset
The at:deleted-entry element MAY contain one at:by element used to
identify the entity that removed the entry. The at:by element is an
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Atom deleted-entry June 2010
Atom Person Construct as defined by Section 3.2 of [RFC4287].
The at:deleted-entry element MAY contain one at:comment element whose
value provides additional, language-sensitive information about the
deletion operation. The atom:comment element is an Atom Text
Construct as defined by Section 3.1 of [RFC4287].
The at:deleted-entry element MAY contain any number of atom:link
elements as specified by Section 4.2.7 of [RFC4287].
The at:deleted-entry element MAY contain one atom:source element as
defined by Section 4.2.11 of [RFC4287]. Within the context of an at:
deleted-entry element, the atom:source element is intended to allow
the aggregation of at:deleted-entry element from different feeds
while retaining information about an at:deleted-entry's source feed.
When an at:deleted-entry element appears in a Feed document other
than it's source Feed or when an at:deleted-entry element that has a
source Feed document is used in the context of a Deleted Entry
Document, it MUST contain an atom:source element.
An Atom feed MAY contain any number of at:deleted-entry elements, but
MUST NOT contain more than one with the same combination of ref and
when attribute values.
...
John Doe
jdoe@example.org
Removed comment spam
...
An Atom feed MAY contain atom:entry elements and at:deleted-entry
elements sharing the same atom:id value. Atom processors SHOULD
ignore any at:deleted-entry elements sharing an atom:id value with an
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Atom deleted-entry June 2010
atom:entry whose atom:updated element specifies a date and time more
recent than or equal to the at:deleted-entry element's when value.
Implementors should note that the at:deleted-entry element is
informative in nature only and may be ignored by Atom processors.
The presence of an at:deleted-entry element does not guarantee that
the atom:entry to which it is referring will no longer be available.
Elements and attributes from other XML vocabularies MAY be used
within an at:deleted-entry element following the same model defined
by Section 6 of [RFC4287]. Processors encountering such markup MUST
NOT stop processing or signal an error. It might be the case that
the Processor is able to process the foreign markup correctly and
does so. When unknown markup is encountered as a child of at:
deleted-entry, Processors MAY bypass the markup and any textual
content and MUST NOT change their behavior as a result of the
markup's presence.
This specification allows the use of IRIs [RFC3987] in precisely the
same manner specified in Section 2 of [RFC4287].
Any element defined by this specification MAY have an xml:base
attribute [W3C.REC-xmlbase-20010627]. When xml:base is used, it
serves the function described in section 5.1.1 of [RFC3986],
establishing the base URI (or IRI) for resolving any relative
references found within the effective scope of the xml:base
attribute.
Any element defined by this specification MAY have an xml:lang
attribute, whose content indicates the natural language for the
element and its descendents. Requirements regarding the content and
interpretation of xml:lang are specified in XML 1.0
[W3C.REC-xml-20040204], Section 2.12.
4. Deleted Entry Document
A "Deleted Entry Document" represents exactly one at:deleted-entry
element outside the context of an Atom feed. It's root is the at:
deleted-entry element.
namespace at = "http://purl.org/atompub/tombstones/1.0"
start = at:deleted-entry
Deleted Entry Documents are specified in terms of the XML Information
Set, serialized as XML 1.0 [W3C.REC-xml-20040204] and identified with
the "application/atomdeleted+xml" media type. Deleted Entry
Documents MUST be well-formed XML. This specification does not
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Atom deleted-entry June 2010
define a DTD for Deleted Entry Documents, and hence does not require
them to be valid (in the sense used by XML).
5. Digital Signatures
The at:deleted-entry element MAY have an Enveloped Signature, as
described by XML-Signature and Syntax Processing
[W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212].
Processors MUST NOT reject an at:deleted-entry containing such a
signature because they are not capable of verifying it; they MUST
continue processing and MAY inform the user of their failure to
validate the signature.
In other words, the presence of an element with the namespace URI
"http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" and a local name of "Signature"
as a child of the document element MUST NOT cause an Processor to
fail merely because of its presence.
Section 6.5.1 of [W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212] requires support for
Canonical XML [W3C.REC-xml-c14n-20010315]. However, many
implementers do not use it because signed XML documents enclosed in
other XML documents have their signatures broken. Thus, Processors
that verify signed at:deleted-entry elements MUST be able to
canonicalize with the exclusive XML canonicalization method
identified by the URI "http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#", as
specified in Exclusive XML Canonicalization
[W3C.REC-xml-exc-c14n-20020718].
Intermediaries such as aggregators may need to add an atom:source
element to an at:deleted-entry that does not contain its own atom:
source element. If such an entry is signed, the addition will break
the signature. Thus, a publisher of individually-signed at:deleted-
entry's should strongly consider adding an atom:source element to
those elements before signing them. Implementers should also be
aware of the issues concerning the use of markup in the "xml:"
namespace as it interacts with canonicalization.
Section 4.4.2 of [W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212] requires support for
DSA signatures and recommends support for RSA signatures. However,
because of the much greater popularity in the market of RSA versus
DSA, Atom Processors that verify signed Atom Documents MUST be able
to verify RSA signatures, but do not need be able to verify DSA
signatures. Due to security issues that can arise if the keying
material for message authentication code (MAC) authentication is not
handled properly, Atom Documents SHOULD NOT use MACs for signatures.
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Atom deleted-entry June 2010
6. Encryption
The root of a Deleted Entry Document (the at:deleted-entry element)
MAY be encrypted, using the mechanisms described by XML Encryption
Syntax and Processing [W3C.REC-xmlenc-core-20021210].
Section 5.1 of [W3C.REC-xmlenc-core-20021210] requires support of
TripleDES, AES-128, and AES-256. Processors that decrypt Deleted
Entry Documents MUST be able to decrypt with AES-128 in Cipher Block
Chaining (CBC) mode.
Encryption based on [W3C.REC-xmlenc-core-20021210] does not ensure
integrity of the original document. There are known cryptographic
attacks where someone who cannot decrypt a message can still change
bits in a way where part or all the decrypted message makes sense but
has a different meaning. Thus, Processors that decrypt Deleted Entry
Documents SHOULD check the integrity of the decrypted document by
verifying the hash in the signature (if any) in the document, or by
verifying a hash of the document within the document (if any).
When a Deleted Entry Document is to be both signed and encrypted, it
is generally a good idea to first sign the document, then encrypt the
signed document. This provides integrity to the base document while
encrypting all the information, including the identity of the entity
that signed the document. Note that, if MACs are used for
authentication, the order MUST be that the document is signed and
then encrypted, and not the other way around.
7. Security Considerations
As specified in [RFC4287], Atom processors should be aware of the
potential for spoofing attacks where an attacker publishes atom:entry
or atom:deleted-entry elements using the same atom:id values as
entries from other Atom feeds. An attacker may attempt to trick an
application into believing that a given entry has either been removed
from or added to a feed. To mitigate this issue, Atom processors are
advised to ignore at:deleted-entry elements referencing entries that
have not previously appeared within the containing Feed document and
should take steps to verify the origin of the Atom feed before
considering the entries to be removed.
The at:deleted-entry element can be encrypted and signed using
[W3C.REC-xmlenc-core-20021210] and [W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212],
respectively, and are subject to the security considerations implied
by their use.
Digital signatures provide authentication, message integrity, and
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft Atom deleted-entry June 2010
non-repudiation with proof of origin. Encryption provides data
confidentiality.
An application supporting the use of digitally signed atom:entry and
at:deleted-entry elements should be aware of the potential issues
that could arise if a at:deleted-entry element indicating the
deletion of an atom:entry element has been signed using a different
key than what was used to sign the atom:entry, or when an unsigned
at:deleted-entry is used to indicate the deletion of a signed atom:
entry. Either case can potentially indicate a form of spoofing
attack. Processors must take steps to verify the validity of the at:
deleted-entry element.
8. IANA Considerations
A Deleted Entry Document, when serialized as XML 1.0, can be
identified with the following media type:
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft Atom deleted-entry June 2010
MIME media type name: application
MIME subtype name: atomdeleted+xml
Mandatory parameters: None.
Optional parameters:
"charset": This parameter has semantics identical to the charset
parameter of the "application/xml" media type as specified in
[RFC3023].
Encoding considerations: Identical to those of "application/xml" as
described in [RFC3023], Section 3.2.
Security considerations: As defined in this specification.
In addition, as this media type uses the "+xml" convention, it
shares the same security considerations as described in [RFC3023],
Section 10.
Interoperability considerations: There are no known interoperability
issues.
Published specification: This specification.
Applications that use this media type: No known applications
currently use this media type.
Additional information:
Magic number(s): As specified for "application/xml" in [RFC3023],
Section 3.2.
File extension: .atomdeleted
Fragment identifiers: As specified for "application/xml" in
[RFC3023], Section 5.
Base URI: As specified in [RFC3023], Section 6.
Macintosh File Type code: TEXT
Person and email address to contact for further information:
James M Snell
Intended usage: COMMON
Author/Change controller: IESG
9. Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the feedback from the members of
the Atom Publishing Format and Protocol working group during the
development of this specification.
10. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC3023] Murata, M., St. Laurent, S., and D. Kohn, "XML Media
Types", RFC 3023, January 2001.
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft Atom deleted-entry June 2010
[RFC3339] Klyne, G., Ed. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the
Internet: Timestamps", RFC 3339, July 2002.
[RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
RFC 3986, January 2005.
[RFC3987] Duerst, M. and M. Suignard, "Internationalized Resource
Identifiers (IRIs)", RFC 3987, January 2005.
[RFC4287] Nottingham, M., Ed. and R. Sayre, Ed., "The Atom
Syndication Format", RFC 4287, December 2005.
[W3C.REC-xml-20040204]
Bray, T., Maler, E., Sperberg-McQueen, C., Paoli, J., and
F. Yergeau, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third
Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium FirstEdition REC-xml-
20040204, February 2004,
.
[W3C.REC-xml-c14n-20010315]
Boyer, J., "Canonical XML Version 1.0", World Wide Web
Consortium Recommendation REC-xml-c14n-20010315,
March 2001,
.
[W3C.REC-xml-exc-c14n-20020718]
Reagle, J., Boyer, J., and D. 3rd, "Exclusive XML
Canonicalization Version 1.0", World Wide Web Consortium
Recommendation REC-xml-exc-c14n-20020718, July 2002,
.
[W3C.REC-xml-names-19990114]
Hollander, D., Bray, T., and A. Layman, "Namespaces in
XML", World Wide Web Consortium FirstEdition REC-xml-
names-19990114, January 1999,
.
[W3C.REC-xmlbase-20010627]
Marsh, J., "XML Base", World Wide Web Consortium
FirstEdition REC-xmlbase-20010627, June 2001,
.
[W3C.REC-xmldsig-core-20020212]
Solo, D., Eastlake, D., and J. Reagle, "XML-Signature
Syntax and Processing", World Wide Web Consortium
FirstEdition REC-xmldsig-core-20020212, February 2002,
.
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft Atom deleted-entry June 2010
[W3C.REC-xmlenc-core-20021210]
Eastlake, D. and J. Reagle, "XML Encryption Syntax and
Processing", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-
xmlenc-core-20021210, December 2002,
.
Author's Address
James M Snell
Phone:
Email: jasnell@us.ibm.com
URI: http://ibm.com
Snell Expires December 24, 2010 [Page 11]