[This local archive copy is from the official and canonical URL, http://www.cimi.org/documents/meta_bestprac_v031.html#appE; please refer to the canonical source document if possible.]


dots
small CIMI logo
| Home | About | Program | Projects | CIMI Standards | Other Standards | Member Area | CIMI Institute |

----

Best Practises Guide v0.3.1

  A note from CIMI's web manager:
This version of the document was created by using the Save As HTML... feature in MS Word98 Mac. This produces poor quality HTML code. (My syntax checker tells me there are more than 2000 errors when checked against the HTML 4.0 Transitional DTD. Most are minor.) If you view this file in MS Internet Explorer it will appear about as expected. If you view it in other browsers, it may exhibit inappropriate formatting.

You may wish to download the Word98 version or the PDF version instead.

Acknowledgements

CIMI thanks Tony Gill, Visual Arts Data Service, and David Bearman, Art Museum Image Consortium, for providing technical review of this document.

Table of Contents

 

Introduction

Consortium for the Computer Interchange of Museum Information

The Dublin Core in the Museum Community

Basis of This Document

Context of This Document

Organization of This Document

Authors

The 15 Dublin Core Elements

Type

Format

Title

Description

Subject

Creator

Contributor

Publisher

Date

Identifier

Source

Relation

Language

Coverage

Rights

Figure A-1 - DC Record Relationships

Examples

Appendix A: Effective Handling of Conflicts in Describing Originals and Surrogates

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

Appendix E: XML DTD Used in CIMI DC Testbed

Introduction

 

Consortium for the Computer Interchange of Museum Information [http://www.cimi.org]

CIMI is a group of institutions and organizations that encourages an open standards-based approach to the management and delivery of digital museum information. We are committed to bringing museum information to the largest possible audience. Since forming in 1990, CIMI has made substantial progress in researching, for the museum community, standards for structuring its data and for enabling widespread search and retrieval capabilities. CIMI's work is largely carried out through collaborative demonstration projects that help us to learn how information can be standardized and therefore made accessible electronically.

The Dublin Core in The Museum Community

This document is a response to a particular "moment in time" in the evolution of the development of the Dublin Core. Readers of this document are directed first to the Dublin Core website and document repository maintained by the Online Computer Library Center, Inc. (OCLC) at http://purl.org/dc/. In addition to an introduction to DC and its status, OCLC provides links to the official DC specification and working group papers.

Given a fundamental understanding of the role of metadata in the discovery of networked information--to aid in resource discovery and to optimize interoperability--we can identify readily several challenges in describing museum and cultural resources with 15 DC (unqualified) elements:

 

In considering the best manner in which resources might be described to enable their long-term discovery, those involved in the Dublin Core process proposed the "1:1 principle." The 1:1 principle states that only one object, resource, or instantiation may be described within a single metadata record. Surrogates of resources, too, must be described separately from the original object, such that a metadata record for a photograph of a Greek sculpture should contain metadata about the PHOTOGRAPH, not about the SCULPTURE.

In many ways, this 1:1 rule makes describing resources easier, as the doubt about whether the photographer or sculptor should be recorded as "Creator" of the object is removed; in a record about the photograph, the creator could ONLY be the photographer, and in the (separate) record about the sculpture itself, the creator could ONLY be the sculptor.

More recently, Dublin Core's move towards embracing the Resource Description Framework (see http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/) has served to reinforce the 1:1 rule, which becomes inherent in resources described using RDF-based Dublin Core.

As of this writing, the 1:1 principle continues to be discussed by the Dublin Core community and has not been formally adopted. CIMI, however, believes strongly in the 1:1 principle and suggests that it be followed strictly until the issue is clarified by the larger DC community. Further discussion of the 1:1 principle can be found in Appendix A of this document.

 

Basis Of This Document

The authors, the CIMI Dublin Core (DC) Metadata Working Group, first convened in October 1997 to plan a project which became the DC Testbed in mid-1998. Three underlying ideas were articulated during project planning, and these testable assumptions served to focus the scope of work:

Eighteen member organizations, listed below, participated in Phase 1 of the DC Testbed. The team comprised an ideal mix of access providers, software vendors and technical support personnel, and content providers. After creation of more than 300,000 records using the 15 DC unqualified elements, participants agreed that consensus on interpretation of the 15 elements’ definitions and standardization of application guidelines ultimately would be more valuable for CIMI, the cultural heritage community, and other Dublin Core stakeholders than identifying the need for DC qualifiers and extensions. This document is one important result of CIMI’s Phase 1 work to explore the useability, simplicity, and technical feasibility of DC.

Context Of This Document

This CIMI Guide to Best Practice addresses only DC 1.0 as documented in RFC 2413–i.e., "unqualified DC." Also known as DC:Simple, the 15 elements that are included in RFC 2413 were designed to enable cross domain interoperability in a simple, unsophisticated manner. This carries with it the underlying assumption that communities will extend this "simple" set of elements to suit their specific needs. More sophisticated levels of interoperability will be addressed in qualified DC. This discussion is on-going and therefore, is referenced only briefly in this document, where relevant.

In addition, it provides direction on representing cultural heritage resources as currently captured and described in typical museum collection management systems–not the entire universe of all possible associated information resources.

Two circumstances should be borne in mind when applying this document. First, CIMI’s recommendations are based largely on experiences gained in the testbed environment–a simulation, not production. Several participants, however, have begun implementations of DC and brought real-life operational wisdom to the project. The creation of records for and, export of records to, a testbed carries the advantages of collegiate support with a relatively wide margin for trial and error and high tolerance for on-the-fly decision-making. An example of this can be found in participants’ agreement to use repeatability for multiple-value elements (e.g., more than one "creator") and to concatenate hierarchical values, beginning with broadest term, separated with semicolons (e.g., North America; United States; Texas; Dallas).

Second, the Dublin Core data model and syntactical representation (with RDF) are still under development at this writing. For better or worse, the mutable "sphere of influence" upon the Dublin Core is pacing our work in terms of determining qualifiers of both the elements and the metadata, nesting formats for syntax, and defining museum best practice to create a consistent testbed for further research.

 

Within the wider Dublin Core community, the Data Model Working Group <http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/dc—datamodel/> is working to express the structure of Dublin Core within an initiative known as the Resource Description Framework (RDF) (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/). This work is approaching completion, and documentation is expected early in 1999.

RDF is recognized as being of key importance to Dublin Core deployment, and future CIMI work might usefully explore its use within the cultural heritage community.

RDF represents one use of a second new development, the Extensible Mark—up Language (XML) (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml). XML, a streamlined version of the more complex SGML, underpins much of the work of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and other agencies, and is seen by many as the future of work on the Web. Indeed, work is underway to represent the basic ‘language’ of the web, HTML, within XML.

A basic XML syntax was defined during the CIMI test bed as the easiest means for transferring data between project partners. The definition of this syntax may be seen in Appendix E, and examples of its use are available in the other appendices.

 

Organization of This Document

This document may be used as a standalone product on the cataloger’s desktop. The official standard definitions of the 15 DC elements are repeated throughout to provide the reader a basis for understanding and applying CIMI recommendations.

The body of this document provides an interpretation of each element’s definition–in many cases showing the writing "between the lines"–as explicated by the CIMI DC Testbed Project. It also presents a brief discussion of tricks, traps, and issues associated with each element along with a range of sample values.

In contrast to the convention of beginning with DC.TITLE, CIMI recommends beginning with DC.TYPE because knowing what you’re describing helps clarify the values of other elements. It is important to remember that the order of elements is irrelevant in the Dublin Core, and that no two elements are dependent. However, an intellectual "anchor" of DC.TYPE is appropriate for the museum community for reasons introduced above. Likewise, always bear in mind that only the consistent interpretation and application of elements is meaningful–not the element labels themselves. "Subject" vs. "keywords" is an example of how one’s prior training or worldview can affect the way an element is defined. DC.SUBJECT contains any words that are "key" to discovering the resource, not necessarily "subject terms" from a thesaurus.

The three appendices present complete example DC records for different types of museum content: fine art, cultural, and natural history, representing both item- and collection-level resources, original and surrogate, as well as records for their associated information resources such as exhibition catalogs or artist biographies.

 

Reality Checking

Creation of DC records is easy provided that three criteria are kept in mind:

Authors

 

Paul Miller, Arts and Humanities Data Service (AHDS) and UK Office for Library and Information Networking (UKOLN)

Thomas Hofmann, Australian Museums On Line (AMOL)

Jim Restivo, Blue Angel Technologies, Inc.

Karen Neimanis and Scott McCallum, Canadian Heritage Information Network (CHIN)

John Perkins, CIMI Executive Director

Nigel Ward, DSTC Pty Ltd

Bert Degenhart Drenth, ADLIB Information Systems

Erin Stewart, CIMI Dublin Core Testbed Project Manager

Angela T. Spinazze, CIMI Dublin Core Testbed Phase II Project Manager

Luca Lelli, Finsiel S.p.A.

Jay Hoffman, Gallery Systems, Inc.

Walter Koch and Heribert Valiant, Joanneum Research Institute

Lynn Underwood, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum

Gordon McKenna, mda

Thornton Staples, National Museum of American Art

Per Enggaard Pedersen, The National Museum of Denmark

James Beach, Natural History Museum-Kansas

Neil Thomson, The Natural History Museum-London

Tom Duncan, University of California-Berkeley, Museum Informatics Project (MIP)

Robin Dowden, Walker Art Center, Integrated Arts Information Access Project (IAIA)

Larry Mills-Gahl, Willoughby Associates Inc.

Martin Beck, Gallery Systems, Inc.

Hsueh-hua Chen, National Taiwan University

Chao-chen Chen, National Taiwan Normal University

Kuang-hua Chen, National Taiwan University


Jason Rothstein, Intermuse, A Division of Willoughby Associates, Limited.

 

TYPE

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"The category of the resource, such as home page, novel, poem, working paper, technical report, essay, dictionary. For the sake of interoperability, Type should be selected from an enumerated list that is currently under development in the workshop series."

CIMI Interpretation

The nature of the resource, including such aspects as originality, aggregation and manifestation.

CIMI Guidelines

DC.TYPE helps to decide the values of other elements. To aid in searching across collections and across different disciplines among museums, specify DC.TYPE from:

1. The list of controlled values maintained by the DC management at http://purl.org/dc/documents/working_drafts/wd-type-current.htm, which is reproduced, as of this writing, as:

and the following list of museum-related values:

2. original or surrogate

3. item or collection

4. natural or cultural

 

Under the current Dublin Core standard, people, organizations, and places are all classified as Physical Objects. While CIMI finds this neither intuitive, nor aesthetically satisfying, we nonetheless recommend conforming to the current standard for the sake of interoperability. As of this writing, the Dublin Core list of controlled values for DC.TYPE is under revision, and it is our hope that the new list will more adequately address the needs of the museum community.

We recommend listing the minimal four values in the order shown above only because consistency breeds thoroughness. Order of elements and order of values is completely arbitrary and entirely meaningless in the Dublin Core scheme.

Example Values

For a painting:

For a photograph of a painting:

For a virtual exhibit:

For a natural specimen:

For a Grecian urn:

For a live theater performance:

For a person:

For an organization:

For a mountain:

For a building:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.TYPE

 

FORMAT

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"The data format of the resource, used to identify the software and possibly hardware that might be needed to display or operate the resource. For the sake of interoperability, Format should be

selected from an enumerated list that is currently under development in the workshop series."

CIMI Interpretation

The properties of the resource that impose the use of tools for access, display, or operation; not the tools themselves. Do not use DC.FORMAT if no tools (beyond the five human senses) are required.

CIMI Guidelines

DC.FORMAT of digital objects should be populated by MIME type/subtype combination as specified at http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/media-types.

DC.FORMAT also may be used to describe the status or disposition of a resource, but not limitations to access or restrictions against usage; see DC.RIGHTS.

In addition, use DC.FORMAT to specify technique, material, and media (but not dimensions; see DC.DESCRIPTION).

DC.FORMAT is rarely relevant for natural specimens (use DC.DESCRIPTION for preparation and mounting methods); however, values of "microscopic" and "telescopic" appear most useful.

 

Example Values

For a vinyl audio record album:

For a videotape:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.FORMAT

 

TITLE

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"The name given to the resource, usually by the Creator or Publisher."

CIMI Interpretation

Name(s) given to the resource, regardless of whose they are--as long as they are useful for resource discovery.

CIMI Guidelines

Repeat DC.TITLE as required.

DC.TITLE values do not have to be unique. However, because DC.TITLE is likely a display field on a result list, we recommend the convention of ["kind of surrogate" of "DC.TITLE"] for records describing surrogates (see example below) to distinguish them from originals, if not otherwise noted.

For untitled works of fine art, use whatever value you would use on the wall label copy, exhibition catalog, or other promotional material–i.e., if the work is known as "Untitled," specify this in DC.TITLE.

For cultural items and collections with no known title or name, use a term or phrase that is sufficiently descriptive to permit a user to judge relevancy. If your existing database does not contain title information, concatenate other descriptive field values as appropriate to "name" the resource.

For natural specimens, specify the scientific name(s) of the animal, plant or mineral as a Latin binomial. If there is more than one name, use the <description> element to tie together the names with their respective values in the <creator> and <date> elements.

Example Values

For a play:

For a surrogate of a cultural artifact:

For a set of clothing:

For a specimen:

For an unidentified object:

For (deliberately) untitled work:

For a coin:

For variant titles (repeating element):

For re-titled work (repeating element):

For an aircraft:

For a lecture:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.TITLE

DESCRIPTION

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"A textual description of the content of the resource, including abstracts in the case of document-like objects or content descriptions in the case of visual resources."

CIMI Interpretation

A textual, narrative description of the resource, including abstracts for documents or content characterizations in the case of visual resources

CIMI Guidelines

Use this element whenever possible, as it is a rich source of indexable vocabulary. Emphasize the contextual information and popular associations (people, places, and events) of the resource.

Include size and duration information if appropriate. The form for presenting units of measurement has not been demonstrated as important.

Natural language prose is preferred; however, if a single "description" field does not exist in your current database, values from other fields or, "tombstone" data, wall label copy, exhibition catalogs, didactic copy, etc. may be concatenated to populate DC.DESCRIPTION. Use repeating elements if the concatenation cannot be achieved automatically or, "on the fly" by the metadata provider.

Since DC.DESCRIPTION is likely a display field with the resource in the search result set, we recommend brevity but not so as to sacrifice richness. Normally a functional description can be accomplished in a few sentences or paragraphs. To contain DC.DESCRIPTION, include only information that is relevant to discovery, and include pointers (via DC.RELATION) to more extensive reference material or background "stories."

For natural specimens, specify the preparation method. For natural specimens with more than one scientific name, use this element to tie together the name, determiner and date for each in the form of a citation, using values from the DC.CREATOR, DC.TITLE, and DC.DATE elements. Where relevant use this element also to tie together the date of collection with the collector and/or the date(s) of observation with the observer(s).

Example Values

For a collection of photographs:

For a collection of copies of photographs:

For a boxing glove:

For an original art collection:

For a painting (metadata concatenated from various sources and existing database fields):

For a natural specimen:

or

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.DESCRIPTION

 

SUBJECT

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"The topic of the resource. Typically, subject will be expressed as keywords or phrases that describe the subject or content of the resource. The use of controlled vocabularies and formal classification schemes is encouraged."

CIMI Interpretation

Keywords about the theme and/or concept of the resource, as well as terms signifying significant associations of people, places, and events or other contextual information.

CIMI Guidelines

Do not strictly interpret the element name "Subject," which tends to lock our thinking into formal "subject terms" such as those used in bibliographic metadata. "Keywords" is a more appropriate interpretation of the kind of values that are useful for this element–index terms, or descriptors, rather than specific-to-broad categorizations of intellectual content.

However, we do recommend the use of controlled vocabularies such as Getty’s Art and Architecture Thesaurus at http://www.gii.getty.edu/aat_browser/titles.html to increase precision and recall. Use of widely recognized classification schemes for other disciplines or domains, such as natural history or medicine, also is encouraged.

The use of repeating elements is preferred. If this is not possible, concatenation of terms separated by semicolons is also acceptable. Use as many descriptors and equivalent terms or phrases as you feel are necessary for resource discovery, include broader terms and equivalent terms only when they aid in resource discovery. A hierarchy is not implied in this element.

For surrogate resources, restate DC.TITLE, DC.SUBJECT and DC.CREATOR values of the original resources as DC.SUBJECT values.

For natural specimens, use the common name(s) rather than the Latin binomial. In addition, specify the next broader common name or, as a minimum, "plant," "animal," or "mineral." Synonyms may also be used.

Example Values

For a street performance:

For a painting:

For a film:

For a film:

For a natural specimen:

For a natural specimen:

 

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.SUBJECT

 

 

CREATOR

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"The person or organization primarily responsible for creating the intellectual content of the resource. For example, authors in the case of written documents, artists, photographers, or illustrators in the case of visual resources."

CIMI Interpretation

The person(s) or organization that conceived or initiated the resource. For example, author of written document; artist, photographer, or illustrator of visual resource; or founder of an institution. For natural specimens, this element specifies the determiner(s), collector(s) and/or, observer(s). When more than one value is present, use the DC.DESCRIPTION element to tie together the creators with their respective values from the DC.TITLE and DC.DATE elements.

 

CIMI Guidelines

List multiple creators separately in repeating elements.

List personal name elements in inverted order, i.e., index name (generally an individual’s surname or the proper name in a title of nobility), first name(s), suffix, prefix. For corporate bodies, the entry element is the full name of the business or organization excluding initial articles.

Judd, Donald

Devonshire, William Cavendish, 2nd duke of

Minneapolis Institute of Arts, The

If a person's name consists of several parts, select as the entry element the part of the name under which the person would normally be listed in authoritative alphabetic lists in his or her language or country. Refer to the second edition of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) sections 22.4-22.17 for guidelines for selecting the entry element in personal headings.

 

Example Values

For an artist:

For a manufacturer:

For an institutional film series:

For the author of a petition:

For the creator of a painting known by means of a nurse’s oral history:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.CREATOR

 

 

CONTRIBUTOR

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"A person or organization not specified in a Creator element who has made significant intellectual contributions to the resource but whose contribution is secondary to any person or organization specified in a Creator element (for example, editor, transcriber, and illustrator)."

CIMI Interpretation

A person or organization not specified in a Creator element because their contributions to the resource are less direct or conceptual (for example, editor or translator). Also used for patrons, benefactors, and sponsors. For natural specimens, the preparator may be entered here.

CIMI Guidelines

List multiple contributors separately in repeating elements.

List personal name elements in inverted order, i.e., index name (generally an individual’s surname or the proper name in a title of nobility), first name(s), suffix, prefix. For corporate bodies, the entry element is the full name of the business or organization excluding initial articles.

Judd, Donald

Devonshire, William Cavendish, 2nd duke of

Minneapolis Institute of Arts, The

If a person's name consists of several parts, select as the entry element the part of the name under which the person would normally be listed in authoritative alphabetic lists in his or her language or country. Refer to the second edition of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) sections 22.4-22.17 for guidelines for selecting the entry element in personal headings.

Do not force a value into DC.CONTRIBUTOR–the element is optional, as is each DC element. Not all "contributing" individuals and organizations are useful for resource discovery.

Do not specify role (e.g., editor, translator, etc.) of the contributor in unqualified DC.

When describing an online catalog, use the name of the institution that holds the resource.

Example Values

For a casting director of a film:

For a news anchorman reading a broadcast:

For a restorer of photographs:

For the editor of a newsletter:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.CONTRIBUTOR

 

PUBLISHER

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"The entity responsible for making the resource available in its present form, such as a publishing house, a university department, or a corporate entity."

CIMI Interpretation

The person(s) or organizations responsible for making the resource available or for presenting it, such as a repository, an archive, or a museum.

Also includes major financial supporters and legislative entities without whose support the resource would not be continuously available, such as a municipal historical council or a board of trustees. (Note: benefactors of the actual resources are listed under DC.CONTRIBUTOR.)

In addition, list distributors and other important agents of delivery in DC.PUBLISHER.

CIMI Guidelines

List multiple publishers separately in repeating elements.

List personal name elements in inverted order, i.e., index name (generally an individual’s surname or the proper name in a title of nobility), first name(s), suffix, prefix. For corporate bodies, the entry element is the full name of the business or organization excluding initial articles.

Judd, Donald

Devonshire, William Cavendish, 2nd duke of

Minneapolis Institute of Arts, The

If a person's name consists of several parts, select as the entry element the part of the name under which the person would normally be listed in authoritative alphabetic lists in his or her language or country. Refer to the second edition of Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) sections 22.4-22.17 for guidelines for selecting the entry element in personal headings.

 

Example Values

For an exhibition catalog:

For a commercial website hosting service of a virtual gallery:

For an electronic gateway to collaborative heritage information resources:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.PUBLISHER

 

 

DATE

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"A date associated with the creation or availability of the resource. Such a date is not to be confused with one belonging in the Coverage element, which would be associated with the resource only insofar as the intellectual content is somehow about that date."

CIMI Interpretation

The date associated with the creation or availability of the resource. This is not necessarily the same as the date in the Coverage element, which refers to the date or period of the resource’s intellectual content. For natural specimens, the value(s) will be those associated with determination(s), observations(s), and/or collection from the field. Where more than one value is present, use the DC.DESCRIPTION element to tie together the dates with their respective values from the DC.CREATOR and DC.TITLE elements.

 

CIMI Guidelines

Recommended best practice is defined in a profile of ISO 8601 [Date and Time Formats (based on ISO8601), W3C Technical Note http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime, which specifies the format YYYY-MM-DD. If the full date is unknown, month and year (YYYY-MM) or just year (YYYY) may be used.

Use a slash ( / ) to separate dates expressing a range.

Repeat DC.DATE to express both the circa value and the range it represents according to your organization’s policy.

Repeat DC.DATE to express both the time period during which the resource was brought into being and the specific date when it was [thought to be] first cataloged or collected.

We recommend that implementors devise an interface for the presentation of dates in a format familiar to most users.

Example Values

For the identification date of a geological rock sample:

For a gallery opening:

For a painting:

For a tapestry:

For the discovery of a bone specimen:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.DATE

 

 

IDENTIFIER

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"A string or number used to uniquely identify the resource. Examples for networked resources include URLs and URNs (when implemented). Other globally-unique identifiers, such as International Standard Book Numbers (ISBN) or other formal names are also candidates for this element."

CIMI Interpretation

A text and/or number string used to effectively identify the resource.

CIMI Guidelines

Use URLs, or URNs, or DOIs (when implemented) for internet resources. For realia, use widely recognized means of identifying items and collections such as accession numbers, International Standard Book Numbers (ISBN), raisonne catalog numbers, and Kochel numbers.

CIMI recommends that, for IDs that are unique within an organization, DC.IDENTIFIER value should be preceded by an ID for the institution itself.

If a DC record for the organization or institution is addressable, use the URL. Otherwise, use the name of the organization or institution.

Example Values

For an virtual organization such as CIMI:

For an institution housed within physical buildings:

For a web page:

For a book:

For a natural specimen:

For a compact disc player:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.IDENTIFIER

 

SOURCE

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"Information about a second resource from which the present resource is derived. While it is generally recommended that elements contain information about the present resource only, this element may contain a date, creator, format, identifier, or other metadata for the second resource when it is considered important for discovery of the present resource; recommended best practice is to use the Relation element instead. For example, it is possible to use a Source date of 1603 in a description of a 1996 film adaptation of a Shakespearean play, but it is preferred instead to use Relation "IsBasedOn" with a reference to a separate resource whose description contains a Date of 1603. Source is not applicable if the present resource is in its original form."

CIMI Interpretation

Information about a resource from which the present resource is directly derived.

CIMI Guidelines

DC.SOURCE is distinguished from a DC.RELATION value of IsBasedOn by degree or strength of the connection. The CIMI testbed group used DC.SOURCE as a "kludge" element pending clarification of the "IsBasedOn" definition by the DC Directorate. Recommended practice is to repeat the value in DC.RELATION and DC.SUBJECT.

Use a text value of the title or name of the parent resource, plus the identifier if known.

Example Values

For a full-size fiberglass casting of a dinosaur skeleton:

For a re-enactment of a Druid ritual:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.SOURCE

 

RELATION

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"An identifier of a second resource and its relationship to the present resource. This element permits links between related resources and resource descriptions to be indicated. Examples include an edition of a work (IsVersionOf), a translation of a work (IsBasedOn), a chapter of a book (IsPartOf), and a mechanical transformation of a dataset into an image (IsFormatOf). For the sake of interoperability, relationships should be selected from an enumerated list that is currently under development in the workshop series."

CIMI Interpretation

Used to describe significant points in the hierarchy of surrogacy, including the immediate parent and the original item. Recommended values are CREATOR, TITLE, IDENTIFIER and any and all progenitors/children including (repeating) DC.SOURCE value(s). (rd)

Associated resource(s) and/or pointer(s) to those resources. (Note: Direct derivational relationships, such as the relationship of a surrogate to an original, are specified in DC.SOURCE.) This includes the following values, whose definitions are maintained at http://purl.oclc.org/metadata/dublin_core/wrelationdraft.html. CIMI emphasizes that because the unqualified DC specification does not present these "qualifiers" as DC element qualifier syntax, the nature of relationships may not be discoverable.

Resource is a physical or logical part of another resource, expressed as:

Resource is an historical state or edition of another resource by the same creator, expressed as:

Resource is a reformatted or mechanically reproduced representation (not interpretation) of another resource, expressed as:

Resource is one for which the creator acknowledges, disputes or otherwise refers to another resource, expressed as:

Resource is one that is a performance, production, derivation, translation, adaptation or interpretation of another resource, expressed as:

Resource is one that requires another resource for its functioning, delivery, or content and cannot be used without the related resource, expressed as:

CIMI Guidelines

Repeat as necessary.

Use tags enumerated above as appropriate, bearing in mind that their functionality in searching is unproven.

Use a pointer to the rich catalog record as a "IsReferencedBy" value when the record is abstracted from it.

Values may point both ways. For unqualified DC, however, we recommend only pointing to the "more aggregated," "less-derived," or "more immediate" resource; in data modeling this is referred to as a child pointing to parent.

For natural specimens that are type specimens, specify the published description with "IsReferencedBy". For parasites, specify the host with "Requires".

Example Values

For a record describing a toy:

For a record describing Jackie Onassis’ pink pill box hat:

For a thumbnail image of an oil painting having accession number 12875.01:

For an English translation of a song:

For a record describing a gall wasp specimen:

For a record describing an exhibition catalog:

 

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.RELATION

 

LANGUAGE

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"The language of the intellectual content of the resource."

CIMI Interpretation

The language of the intellectual content of the resource, not the language of the DC record nor necessarily the language of the DC.TITLE value. "Intellectual content" may be represented as text or as vocal sound. CIMI’s interpretation of this element reflects a potential application of "scheme" in DC Qualified.

CIMI Guidelines

Recommended best practice is defined in RFC 1766 [4] at ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1766.txt,

which provides a term list of language abbreviations. If the language is not included in that reference, spell it out completely.

Use repeated elements to express multiple values.

DC.LANGUAGE is not applicable to natural objects.

Example Values

For a prayer book:

For lyrics of a cabaret song:

For a U.S. nickel:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.LANGUAGE

 

COVERAGE

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"The spatial or temporal characteristics of the intellectual content of the resource. Spatial coverage refers to a physical region (e.g., celestial sector) using place names or coordinates (e.g., longitude and latitude). Temporal coverage refers to what the resource is about rather than when it was created or made available (the latter belonging in the Date element). Temporal coverage is typically specified using named time periods (e.g., neolithic) or the same date/time format as recommended for the Date element."

CIMI Interpretation

Requires no interpretation.

CIMI Guidelines

Repeat DC.COVERAGE values as appropriate in DC.SUBJECT–e.g., "colonial America" or " ‘Baroque’ dance" as an intellectual access point or keyword.

Temporal characteristics:

Recommended best practice for dates is defined in a profile of ISO 8601 [Date and Time Formats (based on ISO8601), W3C Technical Note http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime, which specifies the format YYYY-MM-DD. If the full date is unknown, month and year (YYYY-MM) or just year (YYYY) may be used.

Repeat DC.COVERAGE to express both the circa value and the range it represents according to your organization’s policy.

Repeat DC.COVERAGE to express both the time period during which the resource was brought into being and the specific date when it was [thought to be] first cataloged or collected.

We recommend that implementors devise an interface for the presentation of dates in a format familiar to most users.

For natural specimens, specify the location and collection and/or observation.

Use a slash ( / ) to express date range.

Spatial characteristics:

Use Getty’s Thesaurus of Geographic Names at http://www.gii.getty.edu/vocabulary/tgn.html, specifying at a sufficient granularity to unambiguously identify the location.

The use of repeating elements is preferred. If this is not possible, concatenation of terms separated by semicolons is also acceptable. Use as many descriptors and equivalent terms or phrases as you feel are necessary for resource discovery; include broader terms and equivalent terms only when they aid in resource discovery. A hierarchy is not implied in this element.

Do not use latitude and longitude unless your audience is accustomed to associating resources to places in this manner (e.g., maritime items or events).

Example Values

For a painting of the signing of the Declaration of Independence:

For a travelogue of a train ride:

For a present-day photograph of an historic cottage:

For a geologic rock sample:

For a snake specimen:

For a bone specimen:

For an historic event:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.COVERAGE

 

RIGHTS

 

Standard Definition <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt>

"A rights management statement, an identifier that links to a rights management statement, or an identifier that links to a service providing information about rights management for the resource."

CIMI Interpretation

A rights management or a usage statement, an identifier that links to a rights management or usage statement, or an identifier that links to a service providing information about rights management for and/or usage of the resource.

A statement concerning accessibility, reproduction constraints, copyright holder, and/or inclusion of credit lines.

Absence of DC.RIGHTS in a record does not imply that the resource is not protected.

CIMI Guidelines

Use a pointer to Terms and Conditions or copyright statements for Internet resources.

Ensure proper agreement between the DC.RIGHTS value and the resource in hand–do not, for example, link reproduction notices for digital surrogates to analog objects.

Example Values

For a specimen collection:

For a fragile scroll:

For a virtual museum:

http://www.museum.org/copyright.html

For a videotape:

Example Records

See:

Appendix B: Examples from the Art Community

Appendix C: Examples from the Cultural History Community

Appendix D: Examples From the Natural History Community

 

 

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON DC.RIGHTS

 

APPENDIX A

EFFECTIVE HANDLING OF CONFLICTS IN DESCRIBING ORIGINALS AND SURROGATES

 

 

One proposal, currently under discussion by the larger Dublin Core community, states that one metadata record is created for each resource. This is referred to as the 1:1 principle. It was proposed as a means to give enormous flexibility and power in describing information resources. This seems simple enough but it isn't always so neat because resources are often not so discreet. Should each photograph in an article have its own record and what do we do about describing originals and their surrogates?

The original/surrogate problem is particularly important for museums where original works, a sculpture for example, and surrogates of them like photographs and digital images of the photographs need to be described accurately but at the same time efficiently and usefully.

The problem is illustrated in Examples 1a-c and 2a-c below. Example 1a is a metadata record for the original item, a steel and aluminum sculpture. It has the expected values of Spoonbridge and Cherry, Oldenburg, Claes, van Bruggen, Coosje for <DC:Title> and <DC:Creator> as well as the expected<DC:subject> and <DC:Description> values.

For a photographic transparency of the sculpture, a second metadata record is created as shown in Fig. 1b. This record has different values for <DC:Title> and <DC:Creator> because it represents the surrogate of the sculpture. As a result, Transparency of Spoonbridge and Cherry is the title of the transparency and Halvorson, Glenn is the creator of the transparency (i.e., he is the photographer who took the picture of the sculpture). Also, different metadata are recorded in <DC:Description>, <DC:Subject> and <DC:Publisher> again, because the record refers to the transparency and not the original sculpture. Notice that descriptive information from the metadata record of the original item (the sculpture) appears in <DC:Subject> for the surrogate.

A similar change of metadata occurs in Fig 1c for a JPEG of the transparency of the sculpture. CIMI uses <DC:Source>, <DC:Relation> and <DC:Subject> to show the relationship between the metadata records. While many relations are explicitly known in this example, in practice, the describer of the surrogate may not know, or have access to, information about all of these relationships. Due to the fact that the Dublin Core community is still trying to clarify <DC:Source> and <DC:Relation>, CIMI suggests very specific uses of these elements. For details, see the <DC:Source> and <DC:Relation> element discussions.

The 1:1 rule can create problems both for creators of metadata and searchers. If one was creating a record for the transparency of the sculpture, the inclination might be to use the value Oldenburg, Claes and van Bruggen, Coosje in <DC:Creator> since that information might be deemed to be of far greater utility for retrieval than the unknown photographer. It also makes life much more simple to create a single record rather than two linked together via <DC:Source> and <DC:Relation > values as is shown here in Fig 1b and 1c.

Some in the DC community now believe that the 1:1 principle should be revisited, and there is a working group that will address these issues and recommend guidelines that will promote consistent application. However, as of this writing, CIMI strongly believes that the 1:1 principle and suggests that it be followed strictly until the issue is clarified by the larger DC community.

This set of three metadata records illustrates the use of the 1:1 principle to describe three items. The first describes a sculpture, the second is the transparency of the photograph of the sculpture, and the third is a digitized image of the transparency.

 

Example 1a - Item Record Describing an Art Object

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>Spoonbridge and Cherry</title>

<description>Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen, SPOONBRIDGE AND CHERRY (1985-1988), stainless steel, painted aluminum, overall 354 x 618 x 162", Collection Walker Art Center, Gift of Frederick R. Weisman in honor of his parents, William and Mary Weisman, 1988</description>

<subject>sculpture</subject>

<subject >Pop art</subject>

<creator>Oldenburg, Claes</creator>

<creator>van Bruggen, Coosje</creator>

<contributor>Lippincott, Inc.</contributor>

<contributor>Merrifield-Roberts, Inc.</contributor>

<contributor>Paul E. Luke, Inc.</contributor>

<publisher>Walker Art Center</publisher>

<date>1985/1988</date>

<identifier>wac88.385</identifier>

<relation>IsPartOf Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA</relation>

<relation>References: http://www.artsconnected.org/uia-bin/uia_doc.cgi/framed_art/xwac88.385</relation>

<rights>Walker Art Center</rights>

</dc-record>

Example 1b - Item Record Describing an Art Object Surrogate (transparency)

 

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>surrogate</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<format>4 x 5 color transparency</format>

<title>Transparency of Spoonbridge and Cherry</title>

<subject>Spoonbridge and Cherry</subject>

<subject>sculpture</subject>

<subject>Oldenburg, Claes</subject>

<subject>van Bruggen, Coosje</subject>

<creator>Halvorson, Glenn</creator>

<publisher>Walker Art Center</publisher>

<identifier>wac88.385 transparency</identifier>

<source>Spoonbridge and Cherry</source>

<source>wac88.385</source>

<relation>IsFormatOf wac88.385</relation>

<relation>Spoonbridge and Cherry</relation>

<relation>wac88.385</relation>

<rights>Walker Art Center</rights>

<rights>Copyright retained by the artist</rights>
</dc-record>

Example 1c - Item Record Describing an Art Object Surrogate (digital image)

 

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>surrogate</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<format>image/JPEG</format>

<title>Digital Image of Spoonbridge and Cherry</title>

<subject>Spoonbridge and Cherry</subject>

<subject>sculpture</subject>

<subject>Oldenburg, Claes</subject>

<subject>van Bruggen, Coosje</subject>

<creator>Halvorson, Glenn</creator>

<publisher>Walker Art Center</publisher>

<date>1998</date>

<identifier>wac_786g.jpg</identifier>

<source>Transparency of Spoonbridge and Cherry</source>

<source>wac88.385 transparency</source>

<relation>IsFormatOf wac88.385</relation>

<relation>IsFormatOf wac88.385 transparency</relation>

<relation>Transparency of Spoonbridge and Cherry</relation>

<relation>wac88.385 transparency</relation>

<rights>Walker Art Center</rights>

<rights>Copyright retained by the artist</rights>

<rights>http://www.walkerart.org/resources/res_pc_frame_restrictions.html</rights>

</dc-record>

 

Example 2

This set of three metadata records illustrates the use of the 1:1 principle to describe three items. The first is the lecture by an artist about an artistic experience where he takes a companion on a drive in his sports car along Mulholland Drive in Los Angeles to the accompaniment of a cassette tape of operatic extracts selected to complement the changing scenery as the drive progresses. The second is the archival master videotape of the event and the third is an edited version of the master tape.


Example 2a — Item Record describing a Lecture by an artist

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>
<type>event</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>
<title>Experiencing Mulholland Drive</title>
<subject>Los Angeles, opera, scenic vistas</subject>
<creator>Hockney, David</creator>
<date>1998-09-09</date>
<identifier>ABC123</identifier>

<relation>

<language>English</language>
<coverage>USA</coverage>

<coverage>Los Angeles</coverage>

<coverage>Mullholland Drive</coverage>
</dc-record>

Example 2b - Item Record describing an archival videotape (surrogate) of the lecture by an artist

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>
<type>sound</type>

<type>image</type>

<type>surrogate</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>
<format>betacam sp</format>
<title>Video of Experiencing Mulholland Drive</title>
<subject>Los Angeles, opera, scenic vistas, Hockney, David</subject>
<creator>Smith, John</creator>
<publisher>LA County Museum of Art</publisher>
<date>1998-10-10</date>
<identifier>DEF456</identifier>

<source>Experiencing Mullholland Drive by David Hockney September 1998</source>

<source>ABC123</source>

<relation>IsFormatOf ABC123</relation>

<language>English</language>
<coverage>USA</coverage>

<coverage>Los Angeles</coverage>

<coverage>Mullholland Drive</coverage>
</dc-record>

Example 2c — Item Record describing a 30 minute edited tape (surrogate) of the lecture

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>
<type>sound</type>

<type>image</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>
<format>VHS</format>
<title>Experiencing Mulholland Drive with David Hockney</title>
<subject>Los Angeles, opera, scenic vistas, Hockney, David, Video of Experiencing Mulholland Drive</subject>
<creator>Parsons, Matthew</creator>
<contributor>Smith, John</contributor>
<publisher>Lecture Videos International, Inc. </publisher>
<date>1998-11-11</date>
<identifier>GHI789</identifier>

<source>Experiencing Mullholland Drive by David Hockney September 1998</source>

<source>ABC123</source>

<relation>IsBasedOn DEF456</relation>
<language>English</language>

<coverage>USA</coverage>

<coverage>Los Angeles</coverage>

<coverage>Mullholland Drive</coverage>
</dc-record>

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON APPENDIX A

 

 

APPENDIX B

EXAMPLE RECORDS FROM THE ART COMMUNITY

 

Example B.1 - Item Record Describing an Event

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>event</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>Martin Friedman interviews Claes Oldenburg</title>

<description>Walker Art Center Director Martin Friedman interviews Claes Oldenburg in preparation for the Walker Art Center's 1975 exhibition "Oldenburg: Six Themes."</description>

<subject>Exhibitions: Oldenburg: Six Themes</subject>

<subject>sculpture</subject>

<subject>Oldenburg, Claes</subject>

<creator>Oldenburg, Claes</creator>

<creator>Friedman, Martin</creator>

<contributor>Walker Art Center</contributor>

<publisher>Walker Art Center</publisher>

<date>1974-08-25/1974-08-26</date>

<identifier>Oldenburg interview 1974-08-25/1974-08-26</identifier>

<relation>IsBasisFor Claes Oldenburg with director Martin Friedman: interview, 08/25-26/74, tape 1A and 1B</relation>

<language>en</language>

<rights>Walker Art Center</rights>

</dc-record>

Example B.2 - Item Record Describing an Event Surrogate (cd)

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>sound</type>

<type>surrogate</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<format>CD-R Gold</format>

<title>Claes Oldenburg with director Martin Friedman: interview, 08/25-26/74, pt. 1</title>

<description>37:44 minutes</description>

<description>Location: Los Angeles, Chateau Marmart. Martin Friedman interviews Claes Oldenburg in preparation for the Walker Art Center's exhibition "Oldenburg: Six Themes," 1975. This CD is a transfer of tape 1A and 1B. Track 1: Origins of the "fagend" in Hyde Park, London 1966. Track 2: Discussion of enlarging themes and use of materials, steel and aluminum. Track 3: Are fagends best in sylvan or urban setting? Track 4: Discussion of ashtray. Track 5: Discussion of form and composition.</description>

<subject>Martin Friedman interviews Claes Oldenburg</subject>

<subject>Exhibitions: Oldenburg: Six Themes</subject>

<subject>sculpture</subject>

<subject>Oldenburg, Claes</subject>

<subject>Friedman, Martin</subject>

<creator>Walker Art Center</creator>

<publisher>Walker Art Center</publisher>

<date>1998</date>

<identifier>74.07 (1)</identifier>

<source>Claes Oldenburg with director Martin Friedman: interview, 08/25-26/74, tape 1A and 1B</source>

<relation>IsFormatOf Oldenburg interview 1974-08-25/1974-08-26</relation>

<relation>IsFormatOf Claes Oldenburg with director Martin Friedman: interview, 08/25-26/74, tape 1A and 1B</relation>

<language>en</language>

<rights>Walker Art Center</rights>

</dc-record>

 

 

Example B.3 - Item Record Describing an Event Surrogate (digital recording)

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>sound</type>

<type>surrogate</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<format>audio/ra</format>

<title>RealAudio recording of Claes Oldenburg with director Martin Friedman: interview, 08/25-26/74, pt. 1</title>

<description>37:44 minutes</description>

<description>Location: Los Angeles, Chateau Marmart. Martin Friedman interviews Claes Oldenburg in preparation for the Walker Art Center's exhibition "Oldenburg: Six Themes," 1975. This CD is a transfer of tape 1A and 1B. Track 1: Origins of the "fagend" in Hyde Park, London 1966. Track 2: Discussion of enlarging themes and use of materials, steel and aluminum. Track 3: Are fagends best in sylvan or urban setting? Track 4: Discussion of ashtray. Track 5: Discussion of form and composition.</description>

<subject>Claes Oldenburg with director Martin Friedman: interview, 08/25-26/74, pt. 1</subject>

<subject>Martin Friedman interviews Claes Oldenburg</subject>

<subject>Exhibitions: Oldenburg: Six Themes</subject>

<subject>sculpture</subject>

<subject>Oldenburg, Claes</subject>

<subject>Friedman, Martin</subject>

<subject>Walker Art Center</subject>

<creator>Walker Art Center</creator>

<publisher>Walker Art Center</publisher>

<date>1998</date>

<identifier>oldenburg74_07_1.ram</identifier>

<source>Claes Oldenburg with director Martin Friedman: interview, 08/25-26/74, tape 1A and 1B</source>

<relation>IsFormatOf Oldenburg interview 1974-08-25/1974-08-26</relation>

<relation>IsFormatOf Claes Oldenburg with director Martin Friedman: interview, 08/25-26/74, tape 1A and 1B</relation>

<relation>IsFormatOf:74.07 (1)</relation>

<relation>References http://www.walkerart.org/ace/audio/oldenburg1.html</relation>

<language>en</language>

<rights>Walker Art Center</rights>

</dc-record>

 

Example B.4 - Collection Record Describing the Sound Archive (within which the event surrogates are held)

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>sound</type>

<type>collection</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>Walker Art Center Archives, Audio Recordings</title>

<description>The Walker Art Center Archives includes 340 reel-to-reel audio tapes. These tapes contain remarks by hundreds of contemporary artists from a wide range of disciplines who were active at the Walker between 1956 and 1977. The majority of the recordings are interviews with artists, most often conducted by a curator or the director of the Walker Art Center in conjunction with a major exhibition. Also contained in this collection are panel discussions involving critics and audiences; single-artist lectures addressing important topics of the day; and musical and literary performances by some of the 20th century's leading voices.</description>

<subject>20th century art</subject>

<subject>Walker Art Center Archives</subject>

<creator>Walker Art Center</creator>

<publisher>Walker Art Center</publisher>

<date>1956/1977</date>

<identifier>Walker Art Center Archives, Audio Recordings, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA</identifier>

<relation>IsPartOf Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA</relation>

<relation>IsPartOf Walker Art Center Archives, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA</relation>

<relation>References http://www.walkerart.org/resources/res_arch_frame.html</relation>

<relation>References http://www.walkerart.org/resources/wc_audio.html</relation>

<rights>Walker Art Center</rights></dc-record>

Example B.5 — Collection Record Describing the Art Center (within which the sound archive is held)

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>text</type>

<type>image</type>

<type>sound</type>

<type>interactive</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type><type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>Walker Art Center</title>

<description>Established in 1879, the Walker Art Center began as the first public art gallery in the Upper Midwest, originating as the personal art collection of lumber magnate Thomas Barlow Walker. Today, the Walker is a unique multidisciplinary arts organization with an international reputation. Each year, the Walker organizes an artistic program that both champions the new and initiates groundbreaking historical research. Programs in the visual, performing, and media arts support and present some of the most influential artists and ideas of our time, efforts that have earned the institution wide acclaim and scholarly respect. Walker's annual attendance of nearly 930,000 is in the top ten of all art museums nationally. In 1993 the Walker Art Center adopted a Long Range Plan with the following Mission Statement: The Walker Art Center is a catalyst for the creative expression of artists and the active engagement of audiences. Focusing on the visual, performing, and media arts of our time, the Walker takes a multidisciplinary approach to the creation, presentation, interpretation, collection, and preservation of art. The Walker's programs examine the questions that shape and inspire us as individuals, communities, and cultures.

</description>

<subject>art museum</subject>

<subject>contemporary art</subject>

<subject>film/video</subject>

<subject>media arts</subject>

<subject>performing arts</subject>

<subject>20th century art</subject>

<subject>visual arts</subject>

<creator>Walker, Thomas Barlow</creator>

<publisher>Walker Art Center</publisher>

<date>1879</date>

<identifier>Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA</identifier>

<relation>References http://www.walkerart.org</relation>

<rights>Walker Art Center</rights>

</dc-record>

 

 

Example B.6 — Item Record describing a Conceptual Artwork

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>Double Closed Copper Wall</title>

<description>A conceptual artwork that must be constructed to be realized.</description>

<description>dimensions variable</description>

<subject>visual works</subject>

<subject>sculpture</subject>

<subject>Panza Collection</subject>

<subject>minimalism</subject>

<subject>Judd, Donald</subject>

<creator>Judd, Donald</creator>

<contributor>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</contributor>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1974</date>

<identifier>91.3726</identifier>

<relation>IsPartOf Panza Collection</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

<rights>Panza Collection, 1991</rights>

</dc-record>

Example B.7 — Item Record describing the Fabrication of a Conceptual Artwork

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>Double Closed Copper Wall, Hamburg, Germany February 4, 1999 to May 18,1999</title>

<description>A conceptual artwork that must be constructed to be realized.</description>

<description>49 x 875 x 50 inches</description>

<subject>visual works</subject>

<subject>sculpture</subject>

<subject>Panza Collection</subject>

<subject>minimalism</subject>

<subject>Judd, Donald</subject>

<creator>Judd, Donald</creator>

<contributor>Art Fabrications, Inc.</contributor>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1999-02-04/1999-05-18</date>

<identifier>91.3726 1999-02-04/1999-05-18</identifier>

<relation>IsVersionOf Double Closed Copper Wall</relation>

<relation>IsVersionOf 91.3726</relation>

<relation>IsPartOf Panza Collection</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

<rights>Panza Collection, 1991</rights>

</dc-record>

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON APPENDIX B

 

APPENDIX C

EXAMPLE RECORDS FROM

THE CULTURAL HISTORY COMMUNITY

 

 

Example C-1: Item Record Describing A Museum

 

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>item1</type>

<type>cultural2</type>

<title>Museum of Victoria</title>

<description>The Museum of Victoria houses that state's natural sciences, social history and indigenous studies collections. The Museum seeks to explore and express the origins, development and diversity of culture of the Australian people, and the natural environment in which we function. Exhibitions include some of the finest Aboriginal collections in Australia. The great dinosaurs, Australia's national icon, Phar Lap, the Children's museum and the Koorie Heritage Trust share space with regular changing and touring exhibitions. The H.V. McKay Planetarium is another fascinating venue housed within the Museum. It enables the viewer to explore the far reaches of space from the comfort of a chair.</description>

<subject>Social History</subject>

<subject>Crafts; Decorative arts</subject>

<subject>Design; Drawings and prints</subject>

<subject>Furniture; Glass; Industrial design</subject>

<subject>Jewellery; Leatherwork; Metalwork</subject>

<subject>Painting; Paper; Pottery and ceramics</subject>

<subject>Sculpture; Textiles, spinning, weaving; Woodwork</subject>

<subject>History and society; Local history</subject>

<creator>State Government of Victoria</creator>

<identifier>V125</identifier>

<relation>IsReferencedBy http://amol.org.au/directory/instn/v125.htm</relation>

<rights>http://amol.org.au/about_amol/copy.asp</rights>

</dc—record>

1 — although museums may be considered as both ‘items’ and as ‘collections’ we have decided, for the sake of simplicity, to always label museums as ‘items’ in this context.

2 — museums and collections are considered to be ‘cultural’ constructs, regardless of whether the content of the collection is ‘cultural’ or ‘natural’ in form.

Example C-2: Item Record Describing An Original Cultural Object1

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>item</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<format>Material: Wood</format>

<title>Box</title>

<description>Dimension: L:245mm, W:105mm, H:125mm </description>

<subject>Utensils; Inuit</subject>

<publisher>The National Museum — Denmark; Ethnographic Collection</publisher>

<identifier>L19.246a</identifier>

<relation>IsPartOf L19.246a—L19.246k</relation>

*<coverage>1900/1940</coverage>

*<coverage>Ammassalik distrikt; Tasiilak</coverage>

*<coverage>East Greenland</coverage>

<rights>http://www.natmus.dk/skatkamre/intro.htm</rights>

</dc-record>

 

 

1 - Coverage regarding, geographical and temporal information about the

object is, in this example, related to information about the LastUsage of

the object.

Example C-3: Record Describing A Social History Collection

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>collection</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<title>Social History Collection</title>

<description>The Social History collection is part of the History & Technology Collections Department formed in 1997. The collection has approximately 120,000 objects. Areas of specialisation in this collection include Popular Culture, Social & Domestic Life, Engineering & Trades, Image Sound & Document, Migration and Settlement, Information & Communications, Measurement, Primary Production, Sciences, Transport Technologies, Domestic and Community Life, Numismatics and Philately, Arms & Military Memorabilia, Public and Institutional Life, Working Life, Melbourne, and Human Mind & Body. The collection is used to support the Australian Society, Technology and Human Mind & Body Programs.</description>

<subject>Social History</subject>

<subject>Crafts; Decorative arts</subject>

<subject>Design; Drawings and prints</subject>

<subject>Furniture; Glass; Industrial design</subject>

<subject>Jewellery; Leatherwork; Metalwork</subject>

<subject>Painting; Paper; Pottery and ceramics</subject>

<subject>Sculpture; Textiles, spinning, weaving; Woodwork</subject>

<subject>History and society; Local history</subject>

<subject>Popular Culture; Social & Domestic Life; Engineering & Trades; Image Sound & Document; Migration and Settlement; Information & Communications; Measurement; Primary Production; Sciences; Transport Technologies; Domestic and Community Life; Numismatics and Philately; Arms & Military Memorabilia; Public and Institutional Life; Working Life; Melbourne; Human Mind & Body</subject>

<creator>Museum of Victoria</creator>

<contributor>State Government of Victoria</contributor>

<identifier>AMOL-V125</identifier>

<relation>IsReferencedBy http://www.mov.vic.gov.au/collections/history/</relation>

<rights>http://amol.org.au/about_amol/copy.asp</rights>

</dc-record>

 

Example C-4: Collection Record Describing An Original Cultural Object

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>collection</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type>

<title>Box with Bird Figure and Human Figure</title>

<description>Wooden box with ornamental figure worked in bone, horn and shell.</description>

<subject>Utensils; Inuit</subject>

<subject>Bone; Horn; Shell; Wood</subject>

<publisher>The National Museum — Denmark; Ethnographic Collection </publisher>

<identifier>L19.246a-L19.246k</identifier>

<coverage>1900/1940</coverage>

<coverage>Ammassalik distrikt; Tasiilak</coverage>

<coverage>Inuit</coverage>

<rights>http://www.natmus.dk/skatkamre/intro.htm</rights>

</dc-record>

Example C-5: Collection Record Describing An Original Cultural Object

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<format>Material: paper; Specific materials: cardboard</format>

<title>Photograph of Phar Lap Collage</title>

<description>Phar Lap. Photograph no.1 shows Phar Lap, leaving a stable, covered in a blanket with a strapper. Photograph no.2 shows Phar Lap rolling in the sand with the same person standing next to him, holding the strap. No.3 is a photograph of a stud, looking towards some hills. No.4 is a portrait of Phar Lap's head, wearing a blanket on his neck, which is only just visible.No.5 is the portrait of a jockey's head. He is wearing his jockey's cap and outfit. Photograph no.6 is another portrait of Phar Lap, taken from the side. He is standing in a sandy area on a field, with a tree in the background. The back of the cardboard has a lot of writing and scribble on it. It has a stamp on it, which has been circled with a blue pencil, a torn label and the handwritten word "save", plus some initials (handwritten), have also been crossed out with blue pencil. The photographs are mounted on brown cardboard, and have been trimmed, probably for printing purposes.</description>

<description>Dimension: W:375mm, H:400mm</description>

<subject>Social History</subject>

<subject>Photograph</subject>

<subject>Animal</subject>

<creator>unknown</creator>

<contributor>Phar Lap Woodcock, Tommy</contributor>

<publisher>Museum of Victoria</publisher>

<identifier>92.1955</identifier>

<relation>IsReferencedBy http://pioneer.mov.vic.gov.au/cgi-bin/texhtml? form=catlog.updated&kregno_1=92&kregno_2=1955&kregno_3=</relation>

</dc-record>

Example C-6: Item Record Describing A Surrogate Cultural Object

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<type>image</type>

<type>surrogate</type>

<format>image/jpeg</format>

<title>Image of Box with figures from East Greenland</title>

<description>Dimension: L:245mm, W:105mm, H:125mm </description>

<description>1900/1940</description>

<description>Ammassalik distrikt; Tasiilak</description>

<description>East Greenland</description>

<subject>Utensils</subject>

<creator>Mikkelsen, A</creator>

<publisher>The National Museum — Denmark; Ethnographic Collection</publisher>

<date>1996—06—12</date>

<identifier>4000844.jpg</identifier>

<relation>IsFormatOf L19.246a </relation>

<rights>Mikkelsen, A</rights>

</dc-record>

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON APPENDIX C

 

 

APPENDIX D

EXAMPLE RECORDS FROM

THE NATURAL HISTORY COMMUNITY

 

 

 

Example D-1: Collection Record Describing a Natural History Database

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>dataset</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<format>Microsoft Access</format>

<title>Host / Parasite Database</title>

<description>Database of records for parasites and their hosts. Part of the collections management system for the Department of Zoology at The Natural History Museum,

London</description>

<subject>parasites</subject>

<subject>specimen records</subject>

<creator>Hussey, Charles</creator>

<publisher>The Natural History Museum, London</publisher>

<date>1998</date>

<language>en</language>

<rights>http://www.nhm.ac.uk/generic/copy.html</rights>

</dc-record>

Example D-2: Collection Record Describing an Original Natural History Collection

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>text</type>

<type>image</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>collection</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<format>text/html</format>

<title>Description of the H D King Natural Science Collection held at Norwich Castle Museum, UK</title>

<description>A description of the H D King natural science collection held at Norwich Castle Museum. Collection contains: Cretaceous (Chalk) Fossils (all groups); Source - Norwich and district, Norfolk.</description>

<subject>natural science</subject>

<subject>palaeontology</subject>

<subject>fossil</subject>

<subject>Mesozoic</subject>

<subject>Cretaceous</subject>

<creator>South East Collections Collections Research Unit</creator>

<contributer>Lawrance, P J (collection surveyor)</contributer>

<contributer>Museum Documentation Association, UK (data entry, coding, and standardisation)</contributer>

<publisher>mda, UK</publisher>

<date>1998</date>

<identifier>http://www.mda.org.uk/fenscore/7109se.htm

<language>en</language>

<coverage>Europe</coverage>

<coverage>British Isles</coverage>

<coverage>United Kingdom</coverage>

<coverage>England</coverage>

<coverage>Norfolk</coverage>

<rights>All Information Copyright SECRU, MDA, and institution holding the collection.</rights>

</dc-record>

Example D-3: Collection Record Describing A Natural History Museum

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>The Natural History Museum, London</title>

<description>Museum of natural history, with exhibitions about the life and earth sciences open to the public for a charge. Scientific research institute specialising in taxonomic research based on the collection of 68 million specimens, and with six research themes. The Museum's mission is to &quot;maintain and develop its collections and use them to promote the discovery, understanding, responsible use and enjoyment of the natural world&quot;.</description>

<subject>natural history</subject>

<subject>science</subject>

<subject>exhibitions</subject>

<subject>education</subject>

<publisher>The Natural History Museum, London</publisher>

<date>1881</date>

<identifier>NHM</identifier>

<rights>http://www.nhm.ac.uk/generic/copy.html</rights>

</dc-record>

Example D-4 Item Record Describing a Natural History Specimen

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>natural</type>

<title>Prosorhynchoides pusilla</title>

<description>Specimen fixed in Berland's fluid and preserved in 80% alcohol.</description>

<description>Prepared by: Taskinen, J.</description>

<description>Determiner: Gibson, D.I. </description>

<description>Determination date: 1993-08-21</description>

<subject>parasite</subject>

<subject>fluke</subject>

<subject>animal</subject>

<creator>Gibson D.I.</creator>

<contributor>Taskinen, J.</contributor>

<publisher>The Natural History Museum London</publisher>

<date>1993-08-21</date>

<identifier>1994.1.19.1.</identifier>

<relation>IsPartOf Bucephalidae</relation>

<relation>Requires Esox lucius</relation>

<coverage>Battle River</coverage>

<coverage>Fabyan</coverage>

<coverage>Alberta</coverage>

<coverage>Canada</coverage>

<rights>http://www.nhm.ac.uk/generic/copy.html</rights>

</dc-record>

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON APPENDIX D

 

 

APPENDIX E

XML DTD USED IN CIMI DC TESTBED

 

 

 

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<!DOCTYPE dublin-core-simple [

<!-- DC 1.0, RFC 2413 -->

<!ELEMENT dc-record (title*, creator*, subject*, description*, publisher*, contributor*, date*, type*, format*, identifier*, source*, language*, relation*, coverage*, rights*)>

<!ELEMENT title (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT creator (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT subject (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT description (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT publisher (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT contributor (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT date (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT type (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT format (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT identifier (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT source (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT language (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT relation (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT coverage (#PCDATA) >

<!ELEMENT rights (#PCDATA) >

]

 

Statement of use:

XML syntax is case sensitive. Please refer to the syntax guidelines located at the W3C web site <http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/PR-rdf-syntax-19990105/#usage>. CIMI has chosen to use lower case for all XML representations in this document.

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON APPENDIX E

 

 

APPENDIX F

 

DC Record Relationships

 

 

 

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-1

ITEM

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>No. 86 (Violet, black, violet)</title>

<description>Bob Law, No. 86 (Violet, black, violet) (1970), monochrome dark painting, 174 x 175.3 cm (66 1/8 x 69 inches)</description>

<subject>visual works</subject>

<subject>paintings</subject>

<subject>Panza Collection</subject>

<subject>Law, Bob</subject>

<subject>minimalism</subject>

<creator>Law, Bob</creator>

<contributor>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</contributor>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1970</date>

<identifier>91.3737</identifier>

<relation>IsPartOf Panza Collection</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

<rights>Panza Collection, 1991</rights>

</dc-record>

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-2

COLLECTION THAT INCLUDES THE ITEM

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>text</type>

<type>image</type>

<type>sound</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>collection</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>Panza Collection</title>

<description>In 1990 the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum acquired the important Giuseppe Panza di Biumo collection of more than seven hundred works of American Minimalist art from the 1960s and 1970s.</description>

<subject>installations</subject>

<subject>sculpture</subject>

<subject>visual works</subject>

<subject>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</subject>

<subject>Art and Language</subject>

<subject>Andre, Carl</subject>

<subject>Barry, Robert</subject>

<subject>Bell, Larry</subject>

<subject>Beuys, Joseph</subject>

<subject>Brewster, Michael</subject>

<subject>Brouwn, Stanley</subject>

<subject>Burgin, Victor</subject>

<subject>De Maria, Walter</subject>

<subject>Dibbets, Jan</subject>

<subject>Charlton, Alan</subject>

<subject>Darboven, Hanne</subject>

<subject>Flavin, Dan</subject>

<subject>Fulton, Hamish</subject>

<subject>Heighstein, Jene</subject>

<subject>Heubler, Douglas</subject>

<subject>Irwin, Robert</subject>

<subject>Joseph, Peter</subject>

<subject>Judd, Donald</subject>

<subject>Kosuth, Joseph</subject>

<subject>Law, Bob</subject>

<subject>LeWitt, Sol</subject>

<subject>Long, Richard</subject>

<subject>Mangold, Robert</subject>

<subject>Marden, Brice</subject>

<subject>Mochetti, Maurizio</subject>

<subject>Morris, Robert</subject>

<subject>Nauman, Bruce</subject>

<subject>Nonas, Richard</subject>

<subject>Nordman, Maria</subject>

<subject>On Kawara</subject>

<subject>Opalka, Roman</subject>

<subject>Orr, Eric</subject>

<subject>Ryman, Robert</subject>

<subject>Serra, Richard</subject>

<subject>Shapiro, Joel</subject>

<subject>Tavernari, Vittorio</subject>

<subject>Tivey, Hap</subject>

<subject>Tremlett, David</subject>

<subject>Turrell, James</subject>

<subject>Vogel, Susan Kaiser</subject>

<subject>Webster, Meg</subject>

<subject>Weiner, Lawrence</subject>

<subject>Wheeler, Doug</subject>

<subject>Wilson, Ian</subject>

<subject>collections</subject>

<subject>painting</subject>

<subject>photography</subject>

<subject>Abstract Expressionism</subject>

<subject>art, modern</subject>

<subject>environmental art</subject>

<subject>art and technology</subject>

<subject>conceptual art</subject>

<subject>Minimalism</subject>

<subject>Post-Painterly Abstraction</subject>

<subject>20th Century</subject>

<creator>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</creator>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1960/1970</date>

<identifier>Panza Collection</identifier>

<relation>IsPartOf Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, New York, USA</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

<rights>Panza Collection</rights>

</dc-record>

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-3

MUSEUM THAT INCLUDES COLLECTION THAT INCLUDES THE ITEM

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>text</type>

<type>image</type>

<type>sound</type>

<type>interactive</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, 1071 Fifth Avenue, New York City, New York, 10028</title>

<description>The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, designed by Frank Lloyd Wright, is home to one of the world's finest collections of modern and contemporary art. The Wright building, the youngest to be designated a New York City landmark, is itself one of the greatest works of the Guggenheim Collection. In 1943, Solomon R. Guggenheim commissioned Wright to design a unique building to house his collection of avant-garde art. During the subsequent years of planning and design, Wright applied his vision of fluid and organic architecture to the museum. Construction began in 1957 and was completed in 1959, six months after Wright's death. The museum has acquired several important collections, Justin K. Thannhauser, Peggy Guggenheim, Giuseppe Panza di Biumo and works from the Robert Mapplethorpe Foundation.</description>

<description>1071 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10028</description>

<description>Sunday to Wednesday 10 a.m. - 6 p.m., Friday - Saturday 10 a.m., closed Thursday</description>

<subject>New York, New York, USA</subject>

<subject>art museums</subject>

<subject>artworks</subject>

<subject>collections</subject>

<subject>galleries and museums</subject>

<subject>Museum of Nonobjective Painting</subject>

<subject>museums</subject>

<subject>organizations, nonprofit</subject>

<subject>Guggenheim, Peggy</subject>

<subject>Guggenheim, Solomon R.</subject>

<subject>Krens, Thomas</subject>

<subject>Brancusi, Constantin</subject>

<subject>Calder, Alexander</subject>

<subject>Chagall, Marc</subject>

<subject>Delaunay, Robert</subject>

<subject>Hilla von Rebay Foundation</subject>

<subject>Kandinsky, Wassily</subject>

<subject>Klee, Paul</subject>

<subject>Mapplethorpe, Robert</subject>

<subject>Messer, Thomas M.</subject>

<subject>Miro, Joan</subject>

<subject>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</subject>

<subject>Picasso, Pablo</subject>

<subject>Thannhauser collection</subject>

<subject>Thannhauser, Hilde</subject>

<subject>Thannhauser, Justin K.</subject>

<subject>Wright, Frank Lloyd</subject>

<subject>concept art</subject>

<subject>post-1945 fine arts styles and movements</subject>

<subject>nonobjective art</subject>

<subject>20th century</subject>

<creator>Guggenheim, Solomon R.</creator>

<contributor>Wright, Frank Lloyd</contributor>

<contributor>Thannhauser, Justin K.</contributor>

<contributor>Thannhauser, Hilde</contributor>

<contributor>Guggenheim, Peggy</contributor>

<contributor>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</contributor>

<contributor>Mapplethorpe Foundation, Robert</contributor>

<contributor>Guggenheim, Solomon R.</contributor>

<contributor>Messer, Thomas M.</contributor>

<contributor>Krens, Thomas</contributor>

<contributor>Rebay, Hilla Von</contributor>

<contributor>Sweeney, James Johnson</contributor>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1937</date>

<identifier>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, New York, USA</identifier>

<relation>IsPartOf Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</relation>

<relation>IsPartOf Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation</relation>

<relation>References http://www.guggenheim.org</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

</dc-record>

 

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS — FIGURE F-3

MUSEUM THAT INCLUDES COLLECTION THAT INCLUDES ITEM (alternate record)

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>text</type>

<type>image</type>

<type>sound</type>

<type>interactive</type>

<type>physical object</type>

<type>original</type><type>collection</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</title>

<description>The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum is comprised of five related museums. In addition to the New York City Fifth Avenue location, there is also Guggenheim SoHo, NYC, Guggenheim Bilbao, Spain, Deutsche Guggenheim, Berlin, and the Peggy Guggenheim Collection, Italy</description>

<subject>Bilbao, Spain</subject>

<subject>Berlin, Germany</subject>

<subject>New York, New York, USA</subject>

<subject>Venice, Italy</subject>

<subject>art museums</subject>

<subject>artworks</subject>

<subject>collections</subject>

<subject>galleries and museums</subject>

<subject>Museum of Nonobjective Painting</subject>

<subject>museums</subject>

<subject>organizations, nonprofit</subject>

<subject>Guggenheim, Peggy</subject>

<subject>Guggenheim, Solomon R.</subject>

<subject>Krens, Thomas</subject>

<subject>Brancusi, Constantin</subject>

<subject>Calder, Alexander</subject>

<subject>Chagall, Marc</subject>

<subject>Delaunay, Robert</subject>

<subject>Hilla von Rebay Foundation</subject>

<subject>Kandinsky, Wassily</subject>

<subject>Klee, Paul</subject>

<subject>Mapplethorpe, Robert</subject>

<subject>Messer, Thomas M.</subject>

<subject>Miro, Joan</subject>

<subject>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</subject>

<subject>Picasso, Pablo</subject>

<subject>Thannhauser collection</subject>

<subject>Thannhauser, Hilde</subject>

<subject>Thannhauser, Justin K.</subject>

<subject>Wright, Frank Lloyd</subject>

<subject>concept art</subject>

<subject>post-1945 fine arts styles and movements</subject>

<subject>nonobjective art</subject>

<subject>20th century</subject>

<creator>Guggenheim, Solomon R.</creator>

<contributor>Wright, Frank Lloyd</contributor>

<contributor>Thannhauser, Justin K.</contributor>

<contributor>Thannhauser, Hilde</contributor>

<contributor>Guggenheim, Peggy</contributor>

<contributor>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</contributor>

<contributor>Mapplethorpe Foundation, Robert</contributor>

<contributor>Guggenheim, Solomon R.</contributor>

<contributor>Messer, Thomas M.</contributor>

<contributor>Krens, Thomas</contributor>

<contributor>Rebay, Hilla Von</contributor>

<contributor>Sweeney, James Johnson</contributor>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1920</date>

<identifier>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</identifier>

<relation>IsPartOf Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation</relation>

<relation>References http://www.guggenheim.org</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

</dc-record>

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-4

EXHIBIT OF COLLECTION THAT INCLUDES ITEM

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>event</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>collection</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>The Panza Collection: Motorcycle Myth</title>

<description>The Panza Collection: Motorcycle Myth presents motorcycle imagery in the Giuseppe Panza di Biumo collection. The abstract themes of rebellion, progress, freedom, sex, and danger, are explored.</description>

<description>An exhibition created by the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum on exhibition at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York with accompanying film series, tours, and catalogue.</description>

<subject>motorcycles</subject>

<subject>exhibitions</subject>

<subject>Panza Collection</subject>

<subject>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</subject>

<subject>Charlton, Alan</subject>

<subject>Flavin, Dan</subject>

<subject>Judd, Donald</subject>

<subject>Law, Bob</subject>

<subject>Nauman, Bruce</subject>

<subject>Wheeler, Doug</subject>

<subject>art and language</subject>

<subject>art and technology</subject>

<subject>art, modern</subject>

<subject>minimal art</subject>

<subject>post-painterly abstraction</subject>

<subject>painting</subject>

<subject>photography</subject>

<subject>sculpture</subject>

<subject>20th century</subject>

<subject>1960/1979</subject>

<subject>collections</subject>

<creator>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</creator>

<contributor>Krens, Thomas</contributor>

<contributor>BMW</contributor>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1998/2000</date>

<identifier>The Panza Collection: Motorcycle Myth</identifier>

<relation>References http://www.guggenheim.org/motorcycle.html</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

</dc-record>

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-5

LIVE LECTURE ABOUT EXHIBIT OF COLLECTION

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>event</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>An Evening with Giuseppe Panza di Biumo, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York</title>

<description>Art collector Giuseppe Panza di Biumo discuss art of the 1960's and 1970's.</description>

<description>2 hours</description>

<subject>The Panza Collection: Motorcycle Myth</subject>

<subject>conceptual art</subject>

<subject>exhibitions</subject>

<subject>lectures</subject>

<subject>minimalism</subject>

<subject>motorcycles</subject>

<subject>popular culture</subject>

<subject>20th century</subject>

<creator>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</creator>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1998-05-16</date>

<identifier>Panza di Biumo lecture 1998-05-16</identifier>

<relation>References http://www.guggenheim.org/events.html</relation>

<relation>References The Panza Collection: Motorcycle Myth</relation>

<language>en</language>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

</dc-record>

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-6

AUDIO TAPE OF LECTURE ON EXHIBIT OF COLLECTION

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>sound<type>

<type>surrogate</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<Format>audio tape</Format>

<title>Audio tape of an Evening Giuseppe Panza di Biumo, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York</title>

<description>Art collector, Giuseppe Panza di Biumo discuss art of the 1960's and 1970's.</description>

<description>2 hours</description>

<subject>An Evening Giuseppe Panza di Biumo, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York</subject>

<subject>The Panza Collection: Motorcycle Myth</subject>

<subject>conceptual art</subject>

<subject>exhibitions</subject>

<subject>lectures</subject>

<subject>minimalism</subject>

<subject>motorcycles</subject>

<subject>popular culture</subject>

<subject>20th century</subject>

<creator>Farm, Maxwell</creator>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1998-05-16</date>

<identifier>audio tape 1198-05-16</identifier>

<source>Panza di Biumo lecture 1998-05-16</source>

<relation>IsFormatOf Panza di Biumo lecture 1998-05-16</relation>

<relation>References http://www.guggenheim.org/events.html</relation>

<language>en</language>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

</dc-record>

 

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-7

NEWSPAPER REVIEW OF EXHIBIT

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>text</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<title>Review of The Panza Collection: Motorcycle Myth Exhibition</title>

<description>Sam Augustus, art critic for the Times reviews the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum's exhibition The Panza Collection: Motorcycle Myth</description>

<subject>The Panza Collection: Motorcycle Myth</subject>

<subject>conceptual art</subject>

<subject>exhibitions</subject>

<subject>minimalism</subject>

<subject>motorcycles</subject>

<subject>reviews</subject>

<subject>20th century</subject>

<creator>Augustus, Sam</creator>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1998-05-18</date>

<identifier>NYT Panza 1998-05-18</identifier>

<relation>References The Panza Collection: Motorcycle Myth</relation>

<language>en</language>

<rights>copyright New York Times</rights>

</dc-record>

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-8

TV MINISERIES BROADCAST ABOUT MUSEUM

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>sound</type>

<type>surrogate</type><type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<Format>television broadcast</Format>

<title>TV Miniseries Broadcast of the Making of the Guggenheim Museums</title>

<description>60 minutes</description>

<description>A five part series that traces the growth of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum from its founding in 1937 to its present five locations. Each segment features one of the five Guggenheim museums; New York on Fifth, New York, SoHo, Guggenheim Bilbao in Spain, Deutsche Guggenheim in Berlin, and the Peggy Guggenheim Collection in Venice.</description>

<subject>Guggenheim, Solomon R.</subject>

<subject>Guggenheim Foundation, Solomon R.</subject>

<subject>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</subject>

<subject>Bilbao, Spain</subject>

<subject>Berlin, Germany</subject>

<subject>New York, New York, USA</subject>

<subject>Venice, Italy</subject>

<subject>art museums</subject>

<subject>organizations, nonprofit</subject>

<subject>artworks</subject>

<subject>concept art</subject>

<subject>Museum of Nonobjective Painting</subject>

<subject>television series</subject>

<subject>20th Century</subject>

<creator>XYZ Network</creator>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1999-02-05</date>

<identifier>Guggenheim XYZ Network broadcast 1999-02-05</identifier>

<source>Guggenheim 5-part series</source>

<source>IsFormatOf Guggenheim 5-part series</source>

<relation>References Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

</dc-record>

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-9

VIDEOTAPE OF TV MINISERIES BROADCAST ABOUT MUSEUM

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>sound</type>

<type>surrogate</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<Format>video tape</Format>

<title>Videotape of a TV Miniseries Broadcast of the Making of the Guggenheim Museums</title>

<description>60 minutes</description>

<description>A five part series that traces the growth of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum from its founding in 1937 to its present five locations. Each segment features one of the five Guggenheim museums; New York on Fifth, New York, SoHo, Guggenheim Bilbao in Spain, Deutsche Guggenheim in Berlin, and the Peggy Guggenheim Collection in Venice.</description>

<subject>TV Miniseries Broadcast of the Making of the Guggenheim Museums</subject>

<subject>Guggenheim, Solomon R.</subject>

<subject>Guggenheim Foundation, Solomon R.</subject>

<subject>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</subject>

<subject>Bilbao, Spain</subject>

<subject>Berlin, Germany</subject>

<subject>New York, New York, USA</subject>

<subject>Venice, Italy</subject>

<subject>art museums</subject>

<subject>organizations, nonprofit</subject>

<subject>artworks</subject>

<subject>concept art</subject>

<subject>Museum of Nonobjective Painting</subject>

<subject>television series</subject>

<subject>20th century</subject>

<creator>Wash, Stan</creator>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1999-02-05</date>

<identifier>videotape Guggenheim XYZ Network broadcast 1999-02-05</identifier>

<source>Guggenheim XYZ Network broadcast 1999-02-05</source>

<relation>IsFormatOf Guggenheim XYZ Network broadcast 1999-02-05</relation>

<relation>References Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

</dc-record>

 

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-10

TV SPECIAL ABOUT ARTIST OF ITEM

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>sound</type>

<type>surrogate</type><type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<Format>television broadcast</Format>

<title>An Interview with Dan Flavin</title>

<description>One hour interview with Dan Flavin at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum.</description>

<subject>Flavin, Dan</subject>

<subject>neon</subject>

<subject>Panza di Biumo, Giuseppe</subject>

<subject>visual works</subject>

<creator>XYZ Network</creator>

<contributor>Flavin, Dan</contributor>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1998-10-10</date>

<identifier>Flavin interview XYZ broadcast 1998-10-10</identifier>

<source>Flavin interview 1998-10-10</source>

<relation>IsFormatOf Flavin interview 1998-10-10</relation>

<relation>References Panza Collection</relation>

<rights>copyright XYZ Network</rights>

</dc-record>

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-11

PHOTOGRAPH OF ITEM

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>surrogate</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<format>photograph</format>

<title>Photograph of No. 86 (Violet, black, violet)</title>

<subject>No. 86 (Violet, black, violet)</subject>

<subject>paintings</subject>

<subject>Panza Collection</subject>

<subject>Law, Bob</subject>

<subject>minimalism</subject>

<subject>visual works</subject>

<creator>Fine, Sal</creator>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1999-01-10</date>

<identifier>91.3737 photo</identifier>

<source>91.3737</source>

<relation>IsFormatOf 91.3737</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

</dc-record>

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-12

DIGITAL SCAN OF PHOTOGRAPH OF ITEM

<?xml version="1.0" ?>

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>surrogate</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<format>image/JPEG</format>

<title>Digital Image of No. 86 (Violet, black, violet)</title>

<subject>No. 86 (Violet, black, violet)</subject>

<subject>paintings</subject>

<subject>Panza Collection</subject>

<subject>Law, Bob</subject>

<subject>minimalism</subject>

<subject>visual works</subject>

<creator>Fast, Kenneth</creator>

<publisher>Guggenheim Museum, Solomon R.</publisher>

<date>1999</date>

<identifier>91.3737.jpg</identifier>

<source>91.3737 photo</source>

<relation>IsFormatOf 91.3737 photo</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

</dc-record>

DC RECORD RELATIONSHIPS - FIGURE F-13

MUSEUM WEB PAGE THAT INCLUDES DIGITAL SCAN OF PHOTOGRAPH OF ITEM

<dc-record>

<type>image</type>

<type>original</type>

<type>item</type>

<type>cultural</type>

<format>jpeg</format>

<format>website</format>

<format>HTML</format>

<title> </title>

<description>web page for Digital Image of No. 86 (Violet, black, violet)</description>

<description>384x256</description>

<description>1970</description>

<subject>visual works-paintings</subject>

<subject>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</subject>

<subject>Panza Collection</subject>

<subject>monochrome</subject>

<subject>paintings</subject>

<subject>Law, Bob</subject>

<subject>No.86 (Violet, black, violet)</subject>

<subject>1970</subject>

<subject>384x256<subject>

<creator>Fast, Kenneth</creator>

<publisher>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</publisher>

<date>1999-02-10</date>

<identifier>http://www.guggenheim.org/Panza/paintings/Law_91_3737.html/

<relation>References Panza Collection</relation>

<relation> References Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</relation>

<relation>References 91.3737.jpg</relation>

<relation>IsPartOf Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum web site</relation>

<rights>Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum</rights>

<rights>Panza Collection, 1991</rights>

</dc-record>

 

REVIEWER COMMENTS ON APPENDIX F

----

Navigation | E-mail

Page last modified on Apr. 07/99 by RS

©1999 CIMI