thank you
> -----Original Message-----
> I think we should think more about objects and
> interfaces than shapes and geometries.
>
> For example:
Clay's example makes a lot of sense
(and king of example-elegance is he)
<SOAPBOX>
I for one am not really interested in
making VRML into XML
and I *am* interested in
the potential for being able to more easily express
objects generic thingies into/from VRML
XML as part of the path to glueing together the Web
makes a lot of sense to me
and making VRML *into* XML
doesn't
</SOAPBOX>
jeffs at the vrmLab
-- Jeff Sonstein, MA http://ariadne.iz.net/ http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc ========================================== there are no bugs there are just undocumented features------------------------------------------------------------------------ for list subscription instructions, send email to dbwork-request@vrml.org with text "info"